تأثیر ورمی‌کمپوست و اوره بر عملکرد و شاخص‌های سودمندی کشت مخلوط ذرت شیرین (Zea mays var. Saccharata) و بامیه (Abelmoschus esculentus)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 هیئت علمی

3 هئیت علمی

چکیده

به منظور ارزیابی کشت مخلوط ذرت شیرین و بامیه تحت تأثیر ورمی‌کمپوست و کود شیمیایی اوره، آزمایشی در ‏مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس در بهار و تابستان 1394 انجام شد. در این تحقیق تأثیر پنج نسبت اختلاط ذرت ‏شیرین: بامیه به روش جایگزینی شامل 100‏‎:‎‏0 (کشت خالص ذرت شیرین)، 75‏‎:‎‏25، 50‏‎:‎‏50، 25‏‎:‎‏75 و 0‏‎:‎‏100 (کشت ‏خالص بامیه) و دو نوع سیستم تغذیه‌ای شیمیایی (اوره) و ارگانیک (ورمی‌کمپوست) در آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در ‏قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار بررسی شد. نتایج نشان دادند که برهمکنش عوامل مورد مطالعه اثر معنی-‏داری بر تعداد بلال مرغوب و عملکرد بلال ذرت شیرین و عملکرد دانه بامیه در سطح احتمال یک درصد داشتند. همچنین ‏عامل نسبت اختلاط بر وزن هزار دانه ذرت شیرین در سطح احتمال پنج درصد و بر وزن هزار دانه بامیه و تعداد میوه بامیه ‏در هر متر مربع در سطح احتمال یک درصد تأثیر معنی‌داری داشت. بیش‌ترین عملکرد بلال مرغوب ذرت شیرین و عملکرد ‏دانه بامیه به ترتیب با تولید 58/9614 و 65/2848 کیلوگرم در هکتار از تیمار کشت خالص آن دو با دریافت کود ‏شیمیایی اوره به دست آمد. بالاترین نسبت برابری زمین (10/2) از تیمار نسبت اختلاط 50‏‎:‎‏50 تحت سیستم تغذیه‌ای ‏ورمی‌کمپوست به دست آمد و مخلوط‌ 75‏‎:‎‏25 (ذرت شیرین: بامیه) تحت همان سیستم تغذیه‌ای با نسبت برابری زمین ‏معادل 93/1 در رتبه بعدی قرار گرفت. ارزیابی شاخص رقابت در تیمارهای مختلف نیز رتبه بندی تیمارهای برتر را تأیید ‏کرد. ‏

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of vermicompost and urea on yield and profitability indices of sweet corn (Zea mays var. Saccharata) and okra(Abelmoschus esculentus) intercropping

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Heidarzadeh 1
  • Majid AghaAlikhani 2
1 University of Tarbiat Modares
2 Uninersity of Tarbiat Modares
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluate the intercropping of Sweet corn and Okra affected by vermicompost and ‎urea fertilizer a field experiment was conducted at research field of Tarbiat Modares ‎University during 2015 spring and summer. In this research effect of‏ ‏five mixing ratio‏ ‏of ‎sweet corn/okra including: 100:0 (sweet corn monoculture), 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100 ‎‎(okra monoculture) and two nutrition systems consisted of chemical (urea) and organic ‎‎(vermicompost) were investigated with factorial arrangement of treatments based on ‎randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that factors ‎interaction on the number of desirable ear, sweet corn yield and okra seed yield were ‎significant (P≤ 0.01). Also mixing ratio effect on sweet corn 100 kernel weight (P≤ 0.05), okra ‎‎1000 kernel weight and the number of fruits square meter (P≤ 0.01) was significant. ‎According to mean comparisons the highest sweet corn yields (9614.58 kg.ha-1) and okra ‎‎(2848.65 kg.ha-1) was obtained in their monoculture receiving the chemical fertilizer. The ‎highest LER‏ ‏‎(2.10) was obtained in 50:50 treatment under vermicompost nutrition system ‎followed by 75:25 under same nutrition system (LER=1.93). Also competition index ‎evaluation in the different treatment confirmed the rating of superior treatments.‎

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Competition index
  • Sustainable agriculture
  • compost
  • Land equivalent ratio (LER)‎
  1. Abd El-Gaid, M. A, Al-Dokeshy, M. H. & Nassef, M. T. (2014). Effects of intercropping system of tomato and common bean on growth, yield components and land equivalent ratio in New Valley Governorate. Asian J. of Crop Sci., 6: 254- 261.
  2. Adelakun, O. E., Oyelade, O. J., Ade-Omowaye, B. I. O., Adeyemi, I. A. & Van de Venter, M. (2009). Chemical composition and the antioxidative properties of Nigerian Okra Seed (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench) Flour. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47(6): 1123-1126.
  3. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. & Sinebo, W. (2008). Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28: 257-263.
  4. Aggarwell, P.K., Garrity, D.P., Liboon, S.P., & Morris, R.A. (1992). Resource use and interaction in a ricemungbean intercrop. Agronomy Journal, 84: 71-78.
  5. Altieri, M.A. & Liebman, M. (1986). Insect, weed and plant disease management in multiple cropping systems. In: Francis, C.A. (Ed.), Multiple Cropping Systems. MacMillan, New York, p. 182–218.
  6. Arshi, Y. (2000). Genetically Breeding of Agronomic Vegetables. Jehade Daneshghahi Publishing, Mashhad. 724p. (in Persian).
  7. Arun K.S. (2002) . A Hand Book of Organic Farming. Pub. Agrobis, India.
  8. Bulson, H.A.J., Snaydon R.W. & C.E. Stopes. (1997). Effect of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in on orgonic farming system. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge, 128: 59-71.
  9. Dragicevic, V., Oljaca, S., Simic, M., Dolijanovic, Z., Kresovic, B. & Brankov, M. (2017). Content of some antioxidants in intercropped maize and soybean grain. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62(1), 31-40.

10. Elsen T.V. (2000) . Species diversity as a task for organic agriculture in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 77:101-109.

11. Eskandari, H. & Ghanbari, A. (2011). Evaluation of competition and complementarity of corn (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna sinensis) intercropping for nutrient consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 21(2): 67-75. (In Farsi).

12. Fageria, N.K. & Baligar, V.C. (2005). Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy, 88: 97-185.

13. Griffe P., Metha S. & Shankar D. (2003). Organic Production of Medicinal, Aromatic and Dye-Yielding Plants: forward, preface and introduction.FAO.

14. Guarda, G., Padovan, S. & Delogu, G. (2004). Grain yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. European Journal of Agronomy, 21: 181– 192.

15. Helenius, J. (1990). Plant size,nutrient composition and biomass productivity of oats and faba bean in intercropping, and the effects controlling Rhopalosiphum padi (Hom.,Aphididae) on these properties. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland, 62:21-31.

16. Hongchun, X., Shen, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, X., Wang, P. & Zuo, Y. (2013). Comparative proteomic analysis for assessment of the ecological significance of maize and peanut intercropping. Journal of Proteomics, 78, 447-460.

17. Jayathi,C. (1994). Production potential of compatible fodder cereal-legume mixtures in the North-Western. Zone of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agricultural Journal India, 81(8).

18. Jensen. E.S. (1996). Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrop. Plant and Soil, 182: 25-38.

19. Kizilkaya, R. (2008). Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum strains. Ecological Engineering, 33: 150–156.

20. Liu, E., Yan, C., Mei, X., He, W., Bing, S.H., Ding, L., Liu, Q., Liu, S. & Fan, T. (2010). Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in northwest China. Geoderma, 158: 173–180.

21. Maganha, E. G., Halmenschlager, R. d. C., Rosa, R. M., Henriques, J. A. P., Ramos, A. L. L. d. P. & Saffi, J. (2010). Pharmacological evidences for the extracts and secondary metabolites from plants of the genus Hibiscus. Food Chemistry, 118(1): 1-10.

22. Mandal, B.K., Ghosh, R.K., Das, N.C. & Choudhury, A.K.S. (1987). Studies on cotton based multiple cropping. Experimental Agriculture, 23(4): 443-450.

23. Masuda, T. & Goldsmith, P. D. (2014). World soybean production: Area harvested, yield, and long-term projections. The international Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 12(4), 143-162.

24. Mazaheri, D.  (1994). Intercropping. Tehran University Publications. 262 P. (In Farsi).

25. Mokhtarpoor, H., S.A. Sadat, M.T. Bozy. & A.R. Sabery. (2000). Date of planting and plant density effects on the sweet corn yield. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Science. 8(2): 171- 183. (in Farsi).

26. Morris, R.A. Villegan, A.N., Polthanee, A. & Centeno, H.S. (1990). Water use by monocropped and intercropped cowpea and sorghum after rice. Agronomy, 82: 664-668.

27. Muoneke, C.O. & Ndukwe, O. (2008). Effects of plant population and spatial arrangement on the productivity of okra/Amaranthus intercropping system. Agronomy Science, 7 (1): 54-66.

28. Myaka, F.M., Sakala, W.D., Adu-Gyamfi, J.J., Kamalongo, D., Ngwira, A., Odgaard, R., Nielsen, N.E. & Hogh- Jensen, H. (2006). Yields and accumulations of N and P in farmer-managed intercrops of maize-pigeonpea in semiarid Africa. Plant and Soil, 285: 207-220.

29. Nassiri-Mahallati, M. (2000). Modelling of Crop Growth Processes Agroecology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication, Mashhad, Iran. (In Farsi).

30. Ofosu-Anim, J. & Limbani, N.V. (2007). Effect of intercropping on the growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8: 594-597.

31. Padmavathiamma, P.K., Li, L.Y. & Kumari, U.R. (2008). An experimental study of vermin-biowaste composting for agriculture soil improvement. Bioresource Technology, 99: 1672-1681.

32. Pandita, AK., Saha, MH. & Bali, AS. (2000). Effect of row ratio in cereal- legume intercropping system on productivity and competition functions under Kashmir condition. Indian Journal Agronomy, 45: 48-53.

33. Parajulee, M.N., Montandon, R. & Slosser, J.E. (1997). Relay intercropping to enhance abundance of insect predators of cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover.) in Texas cotton. International Journal of Pest Management, 43: 227–232.

34. Raja Sekar, K. & Karmegan, N. (2010). Earthworm casts as an alternate carrier material for biofertilizers: Assessment of endurance and viability of Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium and Rhizobiumleguminosarum. Scientia Horticulturae, 124: 286-289.

35. Robinson, R.G. (1984). Sunflower for strip row,and relay intercropping. Agronomy Journal, 76: 43-46.

36. Sangwan, P., Kaushik, C.P. & Garg, V.K. (2008). Feasibility of utilization of horse dung spiked filter cake in vermicomposters using exotic earthworm Eisenia foetida. Bioresource Technology, 99: 2442-2448.

37. Scheffer M.C. & Koehler H.S. (1993). Influence of organic fertilization on the biomass, yield and yield composition of the essential oil of Achillea millefolium.  Acta Horticulture, 331:109-114.

38. Seyed Sharifi, R., Farzaneh, S., Kashiri, H. & Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, A. (2004). Evaluation competition and yield of two soybean cultivars under pure stand and intercropping systems. Journal of Agriculture Science, 16(4)-64: 95-102. (In Farsi).

39. Shivaramu,H.S. & Shivashnkar, K. (1992). Performance of sunflower and soybean in intercropping with different plant population and patterns. Indian of Agronomy, 37(2): 231-236.

40. Staniak, M., Księzak, J. & Bojarszczuk, J. (2014). Mixtures of Legumes with Cereals as a Source of Feed for Animals. Organic Agriculture Towards Sustainability (pp. 123-145). INTECH. https://doi.org/10.5772/ 58358.

41. Tofinga, M.P., Paolini, R. & Snaydon, R.W. (1993). A study of root and shoot interactions between cereals and peas in mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge, 120: 13-24.

42. Tohidy Nejad, E., Mazaheri, D. & Koocheki, A. (2004). Study of maize and sunflower intercroppind. Pajouhesh & sazandegi. ndegi & Pajouhesh of Journal,  64: 39-45. (In Farsi).

43. Triplett, Jr. G.B. (1962). Intercrops in corn and soybean cropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 54: 106-109.

44. Zand, B. & Ghaffari Khaliq, H. (2002). Evalluation of grain sorghum-Cowpea intercropping under different planting patterns. Proceeding of the 7th Iranian Congress of Crop Sciences, 24-26 Aug. 2002. Karaj, Iran (In Persian).

45. Zulfigar, A., Asghar Malik, M. & Cheema, M.A. (2000). Studies on determining a suitable canola – wheat intercropping. Agriculture Biology, 2(1): 42-44.