ارزیابی تولید در کشت مخلوط چای ترش (Hibiscus sabdariffa L) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata L) در سری‌ جایگزینی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اگرواکولوژی، دانشگاه زابل

2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه زراعت دانشگاه زابل

چکیده

به‌منظور ارزیابی اجزای عملکرد چای ترش و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی در کشت مخلوط بر اساس سری جایگزینی، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار، در مزرعه پژوهشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل در سال زراعی 93-1392 اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل نسبت‌های مختلف کاشت در پنج سطح کشت خالص چای ترش، 75% چای ترش+ 25% لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی، 50% چای ترش+ 50% لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی، 25% چای ترش+ 75% لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی و کشت خالص لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی بود. نتایج نشان داد که تاثیر نسبت‌های مختلف کشت مخلوط با چای ترش بر ارتفاع بوته، قطر ساقه، تعداد شاخه جانبی و تعداد غوزه در بوته و در لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی بر تعداد نیام در بوته،  تعداد دانه در نیام و وزن هزار دانه معنی‌دار بود. بیشترین ارتفاع بوته (75/182 سانتی‌متر) و تعداد غوزه در بوته (3/84) چای ترش در نسبت کاشت 75% چای ترش+ 25% لوبیا چشم-بلبلی مشاهده شد. همچنین بیشترین وزن هزار دانه و تعداد نیام در بوته لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی، در کشت خالص آن به‌دست آمد. بیشترین نسبت برابری زمین در نسبت کاشت 75% لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی+ 25% چای ترش به‌میزان 65/1 به‌دست آمد. در مجموع نتایج این تحقیق سودمندی بیشتر کشت مخلوط نسبت به کشت خالص چای ترش و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی را نشان می‌دهد. با توجه به نسبت برابری زمین به‌دست آمده، می‌توان بیان داشت که نسبت کاشت 75% لوببای چشم‌بلبلی+ 25% چای ترش می‌تواند در افزایش درآمد اقتصادی و بهره‌وری زمین‌های کشاورزی به‌طور قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای موثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of production in intercropped roselle – with cowpea as replacement series

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hosein Heidari 1
  • Mehdi DahMardeh 2
  • Eisa Khomri 2
1 University of Zabol
2 University of Zabol
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluate the yield components of intercroppedroselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) as replacement series, a field experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with four replications at the Research station, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, during growing season of 2013-2014. Treatments included planting patterns with 5 levels (sole roselle, 75% roselle+ 25% cowpea, 50% roselle+ 50% cowpea, 25% roselle+ 75% cowpea and sole cowpea). Results showed that planting ratios with cowpea had significant effects on plant height, stem diameter, lateral branch and number of bolls per plant of roselle. The effect of planting ratio with roselle was significant on number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight of cowpea. The maximum of plant height (182.75 cm) and lateral branches (84.3) of roselle were achieved in planting ratio of 75% roselle+ 25% cowpea respectively. Also, the highest 1000-seed weight and number of pods per plant were obtained in sole cropping. The maximum LER (1.65) was computed in planting ratio of 75% cowpea+ 25% roselle. This means that seed yield in intercropping improved up to 65% as compared with sole cropping. According to LER obtained, it can be stated that planting ratio of 75% cowpea+ 25% roselle can be significantly increase economic income and agricultural land productivity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Land equivalent ratio
  • plant height
  • pod number
  • stem diameter

مراجع

  1. REFERENCES

    1. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. & Sinebo, W. (2006). Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Euro Journal Agronomy, (22), 202-207.
    2. Ahmad, Y. M., Shahlaby, E. A. & Shnan, N. T. (2011). The use of organic and in organic cultures in improving vegetative growth, yield characters and antioxidant activity of roselle plants (Hibiscus sabdarifa). African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 1988-1996.
    3. Asgharipour, M. R. & Rafiei, M. (2010). Intercropping of isabgol (Plantago ovate L.) and lentil as influenced by drought stress. Am-Eurasian Journal Agriculture Environment Sciences, 9 (1), 62-69.
    4. Beets, W. C. (1982). Multiple cropping and tropical farming systems. West View Press, Boulder.
    5. Carvalho, L. M., Oliveira, I. R., Almeida, N. A. & Andrade, K. R. (2010). The intercropping of fennel with beans and cowpeas in the agreste region of Brazil. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 925, 199-204.
    6. Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Siahsar, B. A. & Ramroudi, M. (2011). Evaluation of yield and protein content of maize and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 13(4), 658-670 (In Farsi).
    7. Daneshnia, F., Amini, A. & Chaichi, M. R. (2015). Berseem clover quality and basil essential oil yield in intercropping system under limited irrigation treatments with surfactant. Journal of Agriculture and Water Management, 164, 331-339.
    8. De la Fuentea, E. B., Suárezb, S. A., Lenardisa, A. E. & Poggioc, S. L. (2014). Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: Evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. NJAS -Wageningen Journal Life Sciences, 165, 42-52
    9. Ghanbari, A., Nasirpoor, M. &. Tavasoli, A. (2011). Eco-physiological characteristics of millet and cowpea in intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 2(4), 11-17.
    10. Gholinezhad, E & Rezaei Chiyaneh, E. (2014). Evaluation of grain yield and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietimum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(3), 236-249 (In Farsi).
    11. Hauggard-Nielson, H., Ambus, P. & Janson, E. S. (2001). Inter-specific competition, N-use and interference with weed in pea- barley intercropping. Journal of Field Crops Research, (70), 101-109.
    12. Heydari, H., Dahmardeh, M. & Khammari, I. (2016). Evaluation of the quantity and quality yield of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping. Research in Crop Ecosystems, 3(1), 43-53 (In Farsi).
    13. Hodiani mehr, A., Dahmardeh, M. & Khammari, I. (2015). Evaluation of tillage systems on agronomical aspects in roselle-green gram intercropping using replacement method. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science, 47(2), 265-276.
    14. Jahani, M., Koocheki, A. & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2008). Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Iranian Journal Field Crops Research, 6(1), 67- 78.
    15. Khalatbari, A. M., Hosseni, S. M. B., Majnoon Hosseni, N. & Mazaheri, D. (2010). Effect of intercropping on forage yield of sorghum and millet. Journal of Crop Science, 41(2), 205-214.
    16. Kiani, S., Siadat, S. A., Moradi Telavat, M. R., Abdali Mashhadi. & Sari, M. (2014). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on forege yield and of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16 (2), 77-90 (In Farsi).
    17. Kiani, S., Siadat, S. A., Moradi Telavat, M. R., Abdali-Mashhadi, A. R. & Sari, M. (2014). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on forege yield and of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 16(2), 77-90 (In Farsi).
    18. Kodori, M. R. & Sharifi Ashourabadi, E. (2015). Evaluation of the quantitative yield in intercropping ratios of Thyme (Thymus daenensis) and Alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Research in Crop Ecosystems, 2(3), 1-12. (In Farsi).
    19. Koocheki, A., Nasiri Mahallati, M., Borumand Rezazadeh, Z., Jahani, M. & Jafari, L. (2014). Yield responses of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and bean (Phaseoluse vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal Field Crops Research, 12 (1), 1-8 (In Farsi).
    20. Kremer, R. J. & Kussman, R. J. (2011). Soil quality in a pecan-kura clover alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA. Agroforest System, 93, 213-223.
    21. Mandal, B. K., Dhara, M. C., Mandal, B. B., Das, S. K. & Nandy, R. (1990). Rice, mung bean, soybean and blackgram yield under different intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 82, 1063- 1066.
    22. Manjith Kumar, B. R., Chidenand, M., Mansur, P. M. & Salimath, S. C. (2009). Influence of different row proportions on yield components and yield of rabi crops under different intercropping systems. Karnataka Journal Agricultur Science, 22(5), 1087-1089.
    23. Mikic, A., Cupinax, B., Rubiales, D., Mihailovi, V., Sarunaitek, L., Fustec, J., Antanasovicx, S., Krsticx, D., Bedoussac, L., Zoricx, L., DorCevic, V. & Peric V., Srebri, M. (2014). Models, developments, and perspectives of mutual legume intercropping. Journal of Advances in Agronomy, 130, 1-83.
    24. Mosapour, H., Ghanbari, A., Sirousmehr, A. R. & Asgharipour, M. R. (2015). Effect of sowing time on seed yield, advantage and competitive indices in ajwain (Carum copticum L.) and isabgol (Plantago ovate Forsk.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 17 (2), 139-152 (In Farsi).
    25. Motaghiyan, A., Pirdashti, H. A., Akbarpoor, W., Sarajpoor, G. H., Yaghobi, M. & Shariatnejad., S. (2013). Evaluation of basil (Ocimum basiilicum L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) yield in different intercropping mixtures via competition indices. Journal of Agro Ecology, 5(3), 333 p. (In Farsi).
    26. Namdari, M. & Mahmoodi, S. (2013). Evaluation of yield and productivity indices in planting ratios of intercropping of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 14(4), 346- 357.
    27. Nassiri Mohallati, M., Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P. & Beheshti, A. R. (2011). Agroecology (translation). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. (In Farsi).
    28. Nazari, SH., Zand, A., Asadi, S. & Golzardi, F. (2012 Effect of additive and replacement intercropping series of corn (Zea mays L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) on yield, yield components and weed biomass. Journal of Weed Research, 4(2), 97-109.
    29. Pandita, A.K., Saha, M.H. & Bali, A.S. (2000). Effect of row ratio in cereal-legume intercropping systems on productivity and competition functions under Kashmir conditions. Indian Journal Agronomy, 45: 48-53.
    30. Philipp, A. (2009). What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views: Switzerland and New Zealand. Journal of Ecological Economics, 68, 1872-1882.
    31. Poggio, S. L. (2005). Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Journal of Agriculture Ecosystem Environment, 109, 48-58.
    32. Pouramir, F., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M. & Ghorbani, R. (2010). Evaluation of yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in intercropping of replacement method. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research, 8(5), 747-757.
    33. Rezaei Chiyaneh, E. & Pirzad, A. R. (2015). Evaluation of yield and advantages of row intercropping of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and moldavian balm (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) at low input condition. Research in Crop Ecosystems, 2(3), 37-51 (In Farsi).
    34. Rezaei Chiyaneh, E., Tajbakhsh, M., Jamali, M. & Ghiyasi, M. (2016). Evaluation of yield and indices advantages at different intercropping patterns of dill (Anethun graveolens L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Journalof Plant Production Technology, 16(1), 15-27.
    35. Rezvani Moghaddam, P. & Moradi, R. (2013). Evaluation of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on yield and essence quantity of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 43(2), 217-230.
    36. Seyedi, M., Hamzei, J., Ahmadvand, G. & Abutalebian, M. A. (2012). The Evaluation of weed suppression and crop production in barley-chickpea intercrops. Journal Agriculture Science Sustain, 22(3), 101-114.
    37. Sobkowicz, P. (2006). Competition between triticale and field beans in additive intercrops. Plant and Soil Environment, 52, 42-54.
    38. Undie, U. L., Uwah, D. F. & Attoe, E. E. (2012). Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of Southern Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture Science, 4(4), 37-50.
    39. Vandermeer, J. H. (1989). The Ecology of intercropping, Cambridge University Press.
    40. Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Wu, P., He, J., Chen, X., Gao, Y. & Cao, X. (2015). Radiation interception and utilization by wheat/maize strip intercropping systems. Journal Agri Forest Meteor, 204, 58-66.

     

علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران
دوره 50، شماره 3
آبان 1398
صفحه 157-167

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 فروردین 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 اردیبهشت 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 خرداد 1397
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 آبان 1398

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار