مقایسه ویژگی های زراعی چهار رقم نخود در کشت بهاره و انتظاری با آبیاری تکمیلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد یار پژوهش در زمینه حبوبات -مرکز تحقیقات و اموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان

2 کارشناس مسئول حبوبات-سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان اصفهان

چکیده

این تحقیق به منظور بررسی تأثیر دو روش کاشت انتظاری و بهاره نخود در سال زراعی 94-1393 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی رزوه (چادگان) با استفاده از آزمایش کرت‌های خردشده با طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار انجام شد. دو روش کاشت انتظاری و بهاره به عنوان کرت اصلی و سه رقم نخود (هاشم، آزاد و آرمان) به همراه شاهد محلی به عنوان کرت فرعی در نظر گرفته شدند. در کشت بهاره ارقام آرمان، آزاد و هاشم به ترتیب با عملکردهای 1220، 1070 و 1010 کیلوگرم در هکتار به طور معنی دار عملکرد بیشتری نسبت به شاهد بومی (702 کیلوگرم در هکتار) داشتند. رقم آزاد با عملکرد 1709 کیلوگرم در هکتار در کشت انتظاری هم نسبت به رقم بومی و هم نسبت به دو رقم آرمان و هاشم به طور معنی دار عملکرد بالاتری داشت. دامنه‌ی کارایی مصرف آب در کشت بهاره و انتظاری به ترتیب برابر ( 39/0 تا 67/0) و (15/0 تا 5/1) کیلوگرم دانه به ازاء هر متر مکعب آب آبیاری بود. استفاده از هر سه رقم جدید نخود برای کشت بهاره و رقم آزاد برای کشت انتظاری در منطقه مطالعه برتری داشته و می‌تواند نقش مهمی در افزایش کارایی مصرف آب داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Compare the agricultural characteristics of four varieties of peas in spring and Entezari cultivation

نویسنده [English]

  • Reza Khakpour 2
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluate the influence of two different cultivation methods included of Entezari and spring planting a one year study (2014-2015) was carried on in Rozveh agricultural research station (Chadegan-Esfahan) using the split plot, based on a randomized complete block design with four replications.Two methods of planting included of Entezari and spring were considered as the main plot and three new varieties of chickpeas (Hashem, Azad and Arman) and local control were subplots. The yields of Arman, Azad and Hashem varieties in spring planting were 1220, 1070 and 1010 kg ha-1, respectively, which significantly was higher than the native cultivar (702 kg ha-1). Azad cultivar in Entezari planting method with 1709 kg ha-1 grain yield, relative to the native varieties and also than the Arman and Hashem had significantly higher performance. In spring and Entezari planting, water use efficiency was in the range of (0.39 to 0.67), and (0.15 to 1.5) kg seed m-3, respectively. The use of all three new varieties of chickpea for spring planting and Azad cultivars for autumn planting in the experimental region (and similar areas) was superiority and could have important role in increasing water use efficiency.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Frost
  • Water use efficiency
  • harvest index
  • Chickeas

مراجع

  1. Abaslu, L., Kazemeini, A. & Edalat, M. (2014). The impact of drought and crop yield and yield components of chickpea. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 5, 79-90. (In Farsi)
  2. Acharya, N.R., Shrestha, J., Sharma, S. & Lama, G.B .(2015).  Study on effect of supplementary irrigation on rainfed chickpea. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 3, 431-433.
  3. Avila Miramontes, J.A., Padilla Zaldo, G., Martinez Heredia, D., Rivas Santoyo, F.J., Coronado Espericueta, M.A. & Ortega Murrieta, P. (2015). Response of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) crop yield components to the inoculation of Mesorhizobium ciceri, Trichoderma harzianum AND Bacillus subtilis in the agricultural region costa de Hermosillo. Biotecnia, 17, 3-8.
  4. Baldwin, L., Domon, J., Klimek, J.F.,  Fourne, F., Sellier, H., Gillet, F., Pelloux, J., Lejeune-Hénaut, I., Carpita, N.C. & Rayon, C. (2014). Structural alteration of cell wall pectin's accompanies pea development in response to cold. Phytochemistry, 104,37-47.
  5. Bayat, R., Sabaghpour, H., Hatami, A. & Mehrabi, A.(2012). Effects of planting date and plant density on yield and yield components of chickpea Arman cultivars. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research,  3, 65-72. (In Farsi)
  6. Croser, J.S., Clarke, H.J., Siddique, K.H.M. & Khan, T.N. (2003). Low- temperature stress: implications for Chickpea improvement. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 22,185-219.
  7. Dehghan, A., Zabihi-Afrouz, R. & Hosseini, M.(2009). Water use efficiency of crops for Iran and compare it with countries of the world. Research Institute of Planning, Economics and Rural Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, 82 pages. (In Farsi)
  8. Devasirvatham, V., Gaur, P.M., Raju, T.N., Trethowan, R.M.  & Tan, D.K.Y. (2015). Field response of chickpea to high temperature. Field Crop Research, 172,59-71. 
  9. Fateh,H., Ciocemardeh, A. & Karimpour, M. (2010). The effects of priming and sowing date on the activities of antioxidant enzymes and pea yield in dryland farming. Journal of Plant Production Technology, 10,1-16. (In Farsi)
  10. Feri, F. & Nemati, A.(2000). Economic evaluation of supplemental irrigation on rainfed wheat and pulses.
  11. In: Proceedings of 6th Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding Science, 13-16 Sep., Mazandaran university. Babolsar, Iran, pp. 211-215 (In Farsi)
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). FAOSTAT, Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx.
  13. Frayedi, Y. (2007). Agronomic characteristics and resistance to cold in chickpea in the autumn sowing.
  14. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 23, 489-503. (In Farsi)
  15. Ganjali, A., Parsa, M. & Sabaghpour, H.(2002). Pulses. Mashhad Jahad Uni. Press, pp: 230-225. (In Farsi)
  16. Haqqani, A.M., Khan, H.R. & Malik, B.A. (2000). Influence of irrigation at various growth stages on water use efficiency and yield of chickpea. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 16, 123-129.
  17. Jalailian, J. & Modares-Sanavi.A.M. (2004). The response of yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars to supplemental irrigation and plant density. In: Proceedings of 8th Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding Science, 2-4 Sep., Guilan University. Guilan, Iran, pp. 358-359 (In Farsi)
  18. Karayel, R. & Bozoglu, H. (2015). The change of some physiochemical properties depending on the sowing times in local pea genotypes. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21,109-1117.
  19. Kigel, J. (1999). Culinary and nutritional quality of Phaseolus vulgaris seeds as affected by environmental factors. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment Journal, 3,205-209.
  20. Kumar, S. (2006). Climate change and crop breeding objectives in the twenty first century. Current Science, 90,1053-1054.
  21. Lake, L. & Sadras, V.O. (2014). The critical period for yield determination in chickpea. Field Crops Research, 168, 1–7.
  22. Leport, L., Turner, N.C., French, R.J., Barr, M.D., Duda, R., Devies, S.L., Tennant, D. & Siddique K.H.M. (1999). Physiological response of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean type environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 11, 279-291.
  23. Lev-Yadun, S., Gopher, A. & Abbo, S. (2000). The cradle of agriculture. Science, 288,1602-1603.
  24. Majnoon-Hosseini, N. & Hamzehei, R. (2010). The effect of the winter and spring crops yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars under dryland conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 1, 59-68. (In Farsi)
  25. Majnoon-Hosseini, N., Mohammadi, H., Poustini, K.,& Zeinaly-Khanghah, H. (2003). Effect of plant density on agronomic characteristics, chlorophyll content and stem remobilization percentage in chickpea cultivars. Iran Agricultural Science Journal, 34, 1011-1019. (In Farsi)
  26. Malhotra, R.S. & Saxena, M.C (1993) Screening for cold and heat tolerance in cool-season food legumes. In: K.B. Singh and M.C. Saxena (Eds.). Breeding for Stress Tolerance in Cool-Season Food Legume. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U. p. 428-438.
  27. Million, E., Naseri, W. & Haddad, I. (2005). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to soil moisture stress at different growth stages. Field Crops Research, 30, 331-341.
  28. Moradi, R. (1995). Compare the yield and yield components of Pea in entezary  and spring cultivation in Karaj. MSc. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran University, Iran, (In Farsi)
  29. Movaghar-Moghadam, H. & Galmakani,T .(2002). Calculation and monitoring of effective rainfall in irrigation systems. Bulletin of the Institute of Ecology, 4, 13-21. (In Farsi)
  30. Mustafavi, S.H., Ghassemi K., Shafagh-Kalvanagh, J. & Movludi, A. (2013). Effect of irrigation disruption at reproductive stages on grain filling of chickpea cultivars. International  Journal of  Agronomy and  Plant Production, 4,863-868.
  31. Nasar-Abbas, S.M., Plummer, J.A., Siddique, K.H.M., White, P., Harris, D. &  Dods K. (2008). Cooking quality of faba bean after storage at high temperature and the role of lignin's and other phenolics in bean hardening. LWT– Food Science and Technology, 41, 1260–1267.
  32. Nezami, A., Bagheri, A., Rahimian, H.,Kafi, M. & Nasirimahalati, M.(1996).  Assessment of pea genotypes under controlled conditions. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4,257-268. (In Farsi)
  33. Ozdemir, S. (2005). Effect of municipal solid waste compost on nodulation plant growth and mineral composition of chickpea in marginal land. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 14, 599-604.
  34. Ozdemir, S. & Karadavut, U. (2003). Comparison of the performance of autumn and spring sowing of chickpeas in a temperature region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture Forestry, 27, 345-352.
  35. Pacucci, G., Troccoli, C. & Leoni, B. (2006). Effect of supplementary irrigation on yield of chickpea genotypes in a Mediterranean climate. Agricultural Engineering International. Retrieved Feb. 21, 2016, from https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/10570.
  36. Rachwa-Rosiaka, D., Nebesnya, E., & Budryna, G. (2015). Chickpeas—composition, nutritional value, health benefits, application to bread and snacks: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55, 1137-1145.
  37. Reyes-Moreno, C., Rouzaud-Sandez, O., Milan-Carrillo, J., Garzon-Tiznado, J.A. & Camacho-Hernandez, L. (2001). Hard-to-cook tendency of chickpea varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81,1008-1012.
  38. Shaban, M., Mansourifar, S., Ghobady, M. & Sabaghpour, H.(2013).  Phonological and morphological characteristics and their correlation with yield in chickpea cultivars under drought stress and nitrogen in Kermanshah. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 4,59-68. (In Farsi).
  39. Sharma, R., Devi, R., Shrma, R.K. & Mehla, J.C. (2013). Efficacy of some botanicals against pulse beetle, in chickpea. Legume Research, 36,125-130.
  40. Silim, S.N., Saxana, M.C. & Singh, K.B. (1993). Adaptation of spring-sown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin. II. Factors influencing yield under drought. Field Crops Research, 34, 137-141.
  41. Singh, K.B. (1991). Winter chickpea: problems and potential in the Mediterranean region. Ciheam- Options Mediterranean's, 9, 25-34.
  42. Singh, K.B. (1993). Problems and prospects of stress resistance breeding in Chickpea: In: K.B. Singh(Ed), Breeding for stress tolerance in cool- season food legumes, (pp. 17-37). John Wiley and Sons, Chi Chester.
  43. Singh, K.B. & Saxena. M.C. (1999). Chickpeas. Macmillan Education Ltd., (2th ed.). London, Bisingtone.
  44. Sugui, F. P. & Sugui, C. C. (2002). Response of Chickpea to Dates of Sowing in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. International Chickpea and Pigeon pea Newsletter, 9, 13-21.
  45. Tanner, C.B. & Sinclair, T.R. (1983). Efficient water use in crop production: Research or re-research? In H.M. Taylor et al. (Ed.), Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. (pp. 1-27). American Statistical Association, Madison, WI.
    1. Younesnejad, M. & Seyedi, F. (2010). Investigate the combined effect supplemental irrigation and planting peas in the Gonbad on yield and water use efficiency. Electronic Journal of crop production, 4, 89-105. (In Farsi)

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 اسفند 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 18 بهمن 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 16 اسفند 1395
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 اسفند 1396

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار