Genetic diversity in spring wheat cultivars and relationships between traits under terminal drought stress

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Iran

چکیده

For evaluation of the traits related to water deficit stress in 20 spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and subsequently  determination of the most tolerant and sensitive cultivars, an experiment was carried out in split plot based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) in the research farm of the University of Tabriz, Iran during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 crop seasons. The first factor was different levels of water stress including water stress (no irrigation after booting stage) and well-watered conditions, and the second factor comprised 20 spring wheat cultivars. The results indicated that there was significant difference between cultivars and irrigation conditions related to nearly all the traits studied here. The mean comparison and cluster analysis of the cultivars showed that Marvdasht, Niknejhad, Moghan3, Darya and Kavir cultivars had the highest values, but Pishtaz, Bam, Sistan, Sepahan and Bahar cultivars had the lowest values for almost of all the traits. Generally, Kavir and Bahar cultivars were recognized as the most tolerant and susceptible cultivars under drought stress, respectively. According to stepwise regression, some traits entered into the final model, as the maximum amounts of correlation coefficient and direct effects were achieved for the number of spike per plant under two conditions. So, screening for higher values of this trait can bring an improvement in wheat grain yield under two conditions. Factor analysis detected three and four factors which explained 89.95 and 88.01 % of the total variation in non-stress and stress conditions, respectively. Under drought stress condition the factors of 1, 2, 3 and 4 named as root, yield and yield components, physiological, and biomass factors, respectively. These coefficients showed that cultivars with higher values of these factors had the highest values for the traits related to names of each factor.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Genetic diversity in spring wheat cultivars and relationships between traits under terminal drought stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marouf Khalili
  • Mohammad Reza Naghavi
Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Iran
چکیده [English]

For evaluation of the traits related to water deficit stress in 20 spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and subsequently  determination of the most tolerant and sensitive cultivars, an experiment was carried out in split plot based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) in the research farm of the University of Tabriz, Iran during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 crop seasons. The first factor was different levels of water stress including water stress (no irrigation after booting stage) and well-watered conditions, and the second factor comprised 20 spring wheat cultivars. The results indicated that there was significant difference between cultivars and irrigation conditions related to nearly all the traits studied here. The mean comparison and cluster analysis of the cultivars showed that Marvdasht, Niknejhad, Moghan3, Darya and Kavir cultivars had the highest values, but Pishtaz, Bam, Sistan, Sepahan and Bahar cultivars had the lowest values for almost of all the traits. Generally, Kavir and Bahar cultivars were recognized as the most tolerant and susceptible cultivars under drought stress, respectively. According to stepwise regression, some traits entered into the final model, as the maximum amounts of correlation coefficient and direct effects were achieved for the number of spike per plant under two conditions. So, screening for higher values of this trait can bring an improvement in wheat grain yield under two conditions. Factor analysis detected three and four factors which explained 89.95 and 88.01 % of the total variation in non-stress and stress conditions, respectively. Under drought stress condition the factors of 1, 2, 3 and 4 named as root, yield and yield components, physiological, and biomass factors, respectively. These coefficients showed that cultivars with higher values of these factors had the highest values for the traits related to names of each factor.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cluster Analysis
  • Drought
  • factor analysis
  • Path analysis
  • Wheat

مراجع

  1. Ahmadi, M., Farshadfar, E. & Veisi, S. (2012). Evaluation of genetic diversity in bread landrace of bread wheat under irrigated and rainfed conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(21), 1627-1636.
  2. Allard, R. W. (1960). Principles of plant breeding. (1st ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 63p.
  3. Araus, J. L., Ceccarelli, S. & Grando, S. (1997). Relationship between leaf structure and carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown barley. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 35, 533-541.
  4. Arias, D. (2007).Calibration of LAI-2000 to estimate leaf area indexand assessment of its relationship with stand productivity in six native and introduced tree species in costarica. Forest Ecology and Management, 1, 24785-193.
  5. Ashraf, M. Y. (1998). Yield and yield component response of wheat (Trittium aestivum L.) genotypes grown under different soil water deficit conditions. ActaAgronomica Hungrica, 46, 45-51.
  6. Bayoumi, T. Y., Eid, M. H. & Metwali, M. M. (2008). Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening tech­nique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. African Journal of Bio­technology, 7, 2341-2352.
  7. Board, J. E., Kang, M. S. & Harville, B. G. (1997). Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late-planted soybean. Crop Science, 37, 879-884.
  8. Boyer, J. S. (1967). Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiology, 42,133-137.
  9. Bramel, P. J., Hinnz, P. N., Green, D. E. & Shibles, R. M. (1984).Use of principal factor analysis in the study of three stem termination types of soybean. Euphytica, 33, 387-400.
  10. Comstock, R. R. & Robinson, H. F. (1952). Genetic parameters, their estimation and significance. In: Proceeding of 6th international Grassland Congress. Wash., D.C., U.S.A. 1, 298-307.
  11. Damania, A. B. & Jackson, M. T. (1986).An application of factor analysis to morphological data of wheat and barley landraces from the Bheri River.Valley Nepol Research, 5, 25-30.
  12. Dawari, N. H. & Luthra, O. P. (1991). Character association studies under high and low environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25, 515-518.
  13. Dewey, D. R. & Lu, K. H. (1959). Correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested Wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51, 515-518.
  14. Erdei, L., Tari, I., Csisza´r, J., Pe´csva´radi, A., Horva´th, F., Szabo, M., Ordog, M., Cseuz, L., Zhiponova, M., Szilak, L. & Gyorgyey, L. (2002). Osmotic stress responses of wheat species and cultivars differing in drought tolerance: some interesting genes (advices for gene hunting). Acta Biology Szegediensis, 46, 63-65.
  15. Farshadfar, E., Farshadfar, M. & Dabiri, S. (2012). Comparison be­tween effective selection criteria of drought tolerance in bread wheat landraces of Iran. Annualsof Biology Research, 3(7), 3381-3389.
  16. Flexas, J., Ribas‐Carbo, M., Diaz‐Esoejo, N., Galmes, J. & Medrano, H. (2007). Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell and Environment, 31(5), 602-621.
  17. Ghaffari, M., Toorchi, M., Valizadeh, M. & Shakiba, M. R. (2012). Morpho-physiological screening sunflower inbred lines under drought stress condition. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17(2), 185-195.
  18. Gholamin, R., Zaeifizadeh, M. & Khayatnezhad, M. (2010). Factor analysis for performance and other characteristics in durum wheat under drought stress and without stress. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 6(6), 599-603.
  19. Giunta, F., Motzo, R. & Deidda, M. (1993). Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in Medi­terranean environment. Field Crops Research, 33(4), 399-409.
  20. Golabadi, M., Arzani, A. & Maibody, S. M. M. (2005). Evaluation of variation among durum wheat F3 families for grain yield and its components under normal and water-stress field conditions. Czech Journal of Genetics andPlant Breeding, 41, 263-267.
  21. Golparvar, A. R., Ghannadha, M. R., Zalli, A. A. & Ahmadi, A. (2002). Evaluation of some morphological traits as selection criteria for improvement of bread wheat. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 202-207. (in Farsi)
  22. Gupta, A. K., Mittal, R. K. & Ziauddin, A. (1999). Association and factor analysis in spring wheat. Annals of Agricultural Research, 20, 481-485.
  23. Inamullah, Z. A., Swati, A. & Siraj-u-Din, L. (1999). Evaluation of lines for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Scientific Khyber, 12(2), 39-48.
  24. Jones, H.G. (1983). Plants and microclimate: A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. (1st ed.).Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London. 89p.
  25. Kashif, M. & Khaliq, I. (2004). Heritability, correlation and path analysis for some metric traits in wheat. International Journal of Agricultural Biology, 6, 138-142.
  26. Khalili, M., Pour Aboughadareh, A. R., Naghavi M. R. & Naseri Rad, H. (2013). Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some of morphological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under normal irrigated and rainfed conditions. Technical Journal of Engineering Applied Science, 3(15), 1692-1696.
  27. Khayatnezhad, M., Zaefizadeh, M., Gholamin, R., Jamaati Somarin, S. & Zabihi Mahmoodabad, R. (2010). Study of morphological traits of wheat cultivars through factor analysis. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9(5), 460-464.
  28. Lorencetti, C., de Carvalho, F. I. F., de Oliveira,A. C., Valério,I. P., Hartwig,I., Benin, G. & Schmidt, D. A. M. (2006). Applicability of phenotypic and canonic correlations and path coefficients in the selection of oat genotypes. Science of Agriculture (Piracicaba brazillian), 63, 11-19.
  29. Lu, Z. & Neumann, P. M. (1999). Low cell-wall extensibility can limit maximum leaf growth rates in rice. Crop Science, 39, 126-130.
  30. Martin, M., Micell, F., Morgan, J. A., Scalet, M. & Zerbi, G. (1993). Synthesis of osmotically active substances in winter wheat leaves as related to drought resistance of different genotypes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 171, 176-184.
  31. Martinez, J. P., Lutls, S., Schanck, A. & Bajji, M. (2004). Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halmius L.? Plant Physiology, 161, 1041-1051.
  32. Maxwell, K. & Johnson, G. N. (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 659-668.
  33. Mc Manus, M. T., Bieleski, R. L., Caradus L. R. & Barker, D. J. (2000). Pinitoal accumulation in mature leaves of white clover in response to a water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 43, 11-18.
  34. Moghaddam, M., Ehdaie, B. & Waines, J. G. (1997). Genetic variation and interrelationships of agronomic characters in landraces of bread wheat from southeastern Iran. Euphytica, 95, 361-369.
  35. Moghaddam, M., Ehdaie, B. & Waines, J. G. (1998). Genetic variation for interrelationships among agronomic traits in landraces of bread wheat from Southwestern Iran. Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 52, 73-81.
  36. Moustafa, M. A., Boersma, L. & Kronstad, W. E. (1996). Response of four spring wheat cultivars to drought stress. Crop Science, 36, 982-986.
  37. Musick, J. T., Jones, O. R., Stewart, B. A. & Dusek, D. A. (1994). Water-yield relationships for irrigated and dryland wheat in the U.S. southern plains. Agronomy Journal, 86, 980-986.
  38. Naghavi, M. R., Moghaddam, M., Toorchi, M. & Shakiba, M. R. (2014). Evaluation of the relationship between morphological and agronomic traits with grain yield in spring wheat cultivars under drought stress. International Journal of Biosciences, 5(3), 88-93.
  39. Naghavi, M. R., Toorchi, M., Moghaddam, M. & Shakiba, M. R. (2015). Evaluation of diversity and traits correlation in spring wheat cultivars under drought stress. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 7(3), 349-354.
  40. Passioura, J. B. (1997). Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 43, 117-120.
  41. Pessarkli, M. (1999). Hand book of plant and crop stress. (2nd ed.).Marcel Dekker Inc. University of Arizona, USA.97p.
  42. Pour Aboughadareh A. R., Naghavi, M. R. & Khalili, M. (2013). Water de­ficit stress tolerance in some of barley genotypes and landraces under field conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5, 249-255.
  43. Rascio, A., Plantani, C., Difonza, N. & Wittemer, G. (1992). Bound water in durum wheat under drought stress. Plant Physiology, 98, 909-912.
  44. Ritchie, S. W., Nguyan, H. T. & Holaday, A. S. (1990). Leaf water content and gas exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science, 30, 105-111.
  45. Sairam, R. K. & Siravastava, G. C. (2002). Changes in antioxidant activity in subcellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long term salt stress. Plant Science, 162, 897-907.
  46. Sanchez-Rodriguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M., Cervilla, L. M., Blasco, B., Rios, J. J., Rosales, L., Romero, M. A. & Ruiz, J. M. (2010). Geno­typic differences in some physiological parameters symp­tomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in to­mato plants. Plant Science, 178, 30-40.
  47. Sharma, S. K. (1985). Factor analysis of berry and its seed characteristics in potato. Plant Genetic and Breeding, 37, 77-82.
  48. Siddique, M. R., Hamid, B. A. & Islam, M. S. (2000). Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Botanical Bulletin of the Academia Sinica (Taipei), 41, 35-39.
  49. Simane, B., Struik, P. C., Nachit, M. M. & Peacock, J. (1993). Ontogenetic analysis of yield components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica, 71, 211-219.
  50. Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. (1991). Plant Physiology. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. 559p.
  51. Talebi, R., Fayaz, F. & Naji, A. M. (2009). Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). Genetics and Applied Plant Physiology, 35(1-2), 64-74.
  52. Tompkins, D. K., Fowler, D. B. & Wright, A. T. (1991). Water use by no till winter wheat influence of seed rate and row spacing. Agronomy Journal, 1,766-769.
  53. Turner, N. C. (1986). Crop water deficit: A decade of progress. Advances in Agronomy, 39, 1-51.
  54. Walton, P. D. (1972). Factor analysis of yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Crop Science, 12, 731-733.
  55. Winter, S. R., Musick, J. T. & Porter, K. B. (1988). Evaluations of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistant winter wheat. Crop Science, 28, 512-516.
  56. Xue, Q., Zhu, Z., Musick, J. T., Stewart, B. A. & Dusek, D. A. (2003). Root growth and water uptake in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Plant and Soil, 257, 151-161.
  57. Zlatev, Z. & Yordanov, I. T. (2004). Effect of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 30, 3-18.
علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران
دوره 48، ویژه نامه
مهر 1396
صفحه 101-117

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 14 دی 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 14 مرداد 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 شهریور 1396
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 مهر 1396

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار