Growth and grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars as affected by plant densities under the fall dry land farming

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Instructor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

A field experiment was carried out during the 2013-2014 growing season in Lorestan Province (Iran) to evaluate the effect of three planting densities (30, 55, and 83 plant.m-2) on growth indices and grain yield of four chickpea cultivars (Azad, Hashem, Arman and ILC482) under the fall dry land farming condition. The experiment design was factorial based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replications. The growth of pea under different planting densities was evaluated by measuring the growth indices including dry matter accumulation (DMA), crop growth rate (CGR), leaf area index (LAI), and relative growth rate (RGR). Results showed that pod number per plant was affected by plant density and cultivar, where ILC482 had the highest pod per plant. Also, the highest pod per plant was observed in the density of 55 plant.m-2 which was 38% and 32% higher than those of 30 and 85 plant.m-2 planting densities, respectively. Branch number, plant height, 100-grains weight, grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were affected significantly by the interaction of cultivar × planting density. ILC482 cultivar had the highest grain yield (2077 kg.ha-1) in the density of 83 plant.m-2 which was 25, 59 and 23% more than that of Hashem, Azad and Arman cultivars, respectively. ILC482 cultivar had the highest LAI and CGR during the growing season. Since the highest grain yield was achieved at the highest density, it is required to evaluate the higher densities effect on grain yield of chickpea under dry land farming.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Growth and grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars as affected by plant densities under the fall dry land farming

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamdollah Eskandari 1
  • Ashraf Aalizadeh Amraee 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Instructor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A field experiment was carried out during the 2013-2014 growing season in Lorestan Province (Iran) to evaluate the effect of three planting densities (30, 55, and 83 plant.m-2) on growth indices and grain yield of four chickpea cultivars (Azad, Hashem, Arman and ILC482) under the fall dry land farming condition. The experiment design was factorial based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replications. The growth of pea under different planting densities was evaluated by measuring the growth indices including dry matter accumulation (DMA), crop growth rate (CGR), leaf area index (LAI), and relative growth rate (RGR). Results showed that pod number per plant was affected by plant density and cultivar, where ILC482 had the highest pod per plant. Also, the highest pod per plant was observed in the density of 55 plant.m-2 which was 38% and 32% higher than those of 30 and 85 plant.m-2 planting densities, respectively. Branch number, plant height, 100-grains weight, grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were affected significantly by the interaction of cultivar × planting density. ILC482 cultivar had the highest grain yield (2077 kg.ha-1) in the density of 83 plant.m-2 which was 25, 59 and 23% more than that of Hashem, Azad and Arman cultivars, respectively. ILC482 cultivar had the highest LAI and CGR during the growing season. Since the highest grain yield was achieved at the highest density, it is required to evaluate the higher densities effect on grain yield of chickpea under dry land farming.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chickpea cultivars
  • Crop growth rate
  • dry matter
  • leaf area index
  • plant population
  • relative growth
  • Yield
  • Yield component
  1. Abdolrahmani, B., Ghasemi-Golezani, K., Valizadeh, M., Feizi-Asl, V. & Tavakoli, A. R. (2011). Effect of seed priming on the growth trend and grain yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Abidar under rainfed conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 27(1), 111-129. (in Farsi) 
  2. Ahmadi, K. (2015). Agriculture statistics of crops for 2013 growing season. Jahade-e-Agriculture Ministry Press. Tehran. (in Farsi)
  3. Ahmadian, A. M., Sobhani, A. & Malek-Masoud, M. (2005). Effect of plant density on yield and yield component of chickpea under dry land condition of north Khorasan. In:  First Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, 29-30 Nov, Mashhad, Iran, pp 95-97. (in Farsi)
  4. Ahmadi, M. H. & Kanooni, H. (1994). Study of the effect of seeding rates on yielding of varieties of white and black chickpea in Kurdistan. Journal of Plant and Seed, 10, 32-38. (in Farsi)
  5. Arian-Nia, N., Enayat-Gholizadeh, M. & Sharafizadeh, M. (2009). Effect of planting date and cultivar on physiological indices and yield of mungbean in North Khuzestan. In: Iranian Symposium on Water, Soil Plant and Mechanization Science, 29-30 Sep, Dezful. Iran, pp 36-37. (in Farsi)
  6. Bahl, P. N. (1980). Kabuli-Desi-introgression and genesis of new plant typos in chickpea. In: proceeding of the international workshop on chick pea improvement, 28-29 Mar, Dehli, India, pp 75-80.
  7. Bullock, D. G., Nielson, R. & Nypuist, W. E. (1988). A growth analysis comparison of corn growth in conventional and equidistant plant spacing. Crop Science, 24, 1184-1191.
  8. Davidson, H. R. & Campbell, C. A. (1984). Growth rates, harvest index and moisture use of spring wheat as influenced by nitrogen, temperature and moisture. Canadian. Journal of Plant Science, 64, 825-839.
  9. Ebrahimi, M., Pour-yousef, M., Rastgoo, M. & Saba, J. (2012). Effect of planting date plant density and weeds on growth index of soybean. Journal of Plant Protection, 26(2), 178-190.
  10. Ehsanzadeh, P., Noormohammadi, S. & Nazari, S. (2006). Study of yield and yield component of three chickpea genotypes in different planting densities and two cultivations method under dry land farming of Khoramabad-Lorestan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(37), 101-111. (in Farsi)
  11. Filippeti, A. (1990). Variability of plant and seed characteristics in a collection of chickpea. Legume Research, 13, 39-46.
  12. Hashemi-Dezfouli, A., Koocheki, A. & Banayan-Aval, M. (1995). Increasing crop yield. Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research press, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).
  13. Kanooni, H. & Nematifard, M. (2013). Effect of Sowing Time and Seeding Rate on Seed Yield and Some Agronomic Traits of Two Kabuli Chickpea Genotypes in Autumn Sowing in Rainfed Conditions in Kurdistan Province of Iran. Seed and Plant Production, 2(2), 185-200. (in Farsi)
  14. Kashfi, S. M. H., Majnoon-Hosseini, N. & Zeinali Khaneghah, H. (2010). Effect of plant density and starter nitrogen fertilizer on yield and yield component of chickpea at Karaj conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulse Research, 1(2), 11-20. (in Farsi)
  15. Khorsandi, H., Ghafari, A., Taj-Bakhsh Shishvan, M. & Zad-Hassan, A. (2013). Study on crop growth rate and relative growth rate in bread wheat genotypes under rain fed and supplementary irrigation conditions. Journal of Dry Land Agronomy, 1(4), 69-83. (in Farsi)
  16. Latifi, N. & Navabpoor, S. (2000). The response of growth indices and seed yield of two pinto bean to row spacing nd plant population. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(31), 353-363. (in Farsi)
  17. Leport, L., Turner, N. C., Daries, S. L. & Siddique, K. H. M. (2005). Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. Crop Science, 24, 236-246.
  18. Majnoon-Hosseini, N., Mohammadi, H., Poustini, K. & Zeinaly-Khangah, H. (2003). Effect of plant density on agronomic characteristics, chlorophyll content and stem remobilization percentage in chickpea cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 34, 1011-1019. (in Farsi)
  19. Malek, M. M., Galeshi, S., Zeinali, A., Ajamnorozi, A. & Makek M. (2012). Investigation of leaf area index, dry matter and crop growth rate on the yield and yield components of soybean cultivars. Journal of Plant Protection, 5(4), 1-17. (in Farsi)
  20. Naseri, R., Siyadar, S. A., Soleymani Fard, A., Soleymani, R. & Khosh Khabar, H. (2011). Effects of planting date and density on yield, yield components and protein content of three chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under rainfed conditions in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 2(2), 7-18. (in Farsi)
  21. Nazeri, P., Kashani, A., Khavazi, K., Ardakani, M. R. & Mir-Akhori, M. (2012). Effect of use microbial zinc granulated phosphorous bio fertilizer on growth Indices of bean. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(2), 11-126. (in Farsi)
  22. Pezeshkpoor, P., Shahverdi, M. & Ahmadi A. (2005). Autumn-winter cultivation of chickpea as an effective way for drought stress scape in semi-arid regions. (Abstract). In: Abstract Book of the first Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, November 29-30 Nov, Mashhad, Iran, pp 34-35. (in Farsi)
  23. Rahimi, A., Soltani, A., Purreza, J., Zaianli, E. & Sarparast, R. (2006). Allometric relationships between leaf area and vegetative characteristics in field-grown chickpea. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resource, 13(5), 1-11. (in Farsi)
  24. Rezvani-Moghaddam, P. & Sadegh-Samarjan, R. (2008). Effect of planting date and irrigation regimes on morphological properties and yield of chickpea cultivar ICL 3279 under Neyshaboor weather condition. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Research, 2, 315-325. (in Farsi)
  25. Saber-Ali, F., Sadat-Noori, A., Hejazi, A., Zand, A. & Baghestani, M. A. (2007). Effect of density and planting pattern on growth and yield of maize under competition with chenopodeum album. Agronomy Journal, 74, 143-152. (in Farsi)
  26. Sarmad-Nia, G. & Koocheki, A. (1988). Crop Physiology. Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research press, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).
  27. Seddique, K. N. M. & Sedgely, R. H. (1985). The effect of reduced branching on yield and water use of chickpea in a Mediterranean type of environment. Field Crops Research, 12, 251-296.
  28. Seyed-Sharifi, R., Mohammadi-Khangah, P. & Raie, Y. (2013). Effect of plant density on yield, yield component and some physiological traits of three chickpea cultivars. Journal of Crop Physiology, 20, 25-38. (in Farsi)
  29. Shams, K., Kobraie, S. & Rezaie-Zangeneh, R. (2005). The effects of planting density on the trend of grain filling ;yield and yield component of three chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Kermanshah. In: First Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, 29-30 Nov, Mashhad, Iran, pp 89-91. (in Farsi)
  30. Shobeiri, A., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Golchin, A. & Saba, J. (2007). Effect of water limitation on growth and yield of three chickpea cultivars in Zanjan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 14(2), 32-43. (in Farsi) 
  31. Soltani, A., Hajipour, A. & Vadez, V. (2016). Analysis of chickpea yield gap and water-limited potential yield in Iran. Field Crops Research, 185, 21-30.
  32. Summerfield, R. T. & Roberts, E. H. (1986). Grain Legume crop, Mack’s of Chatham, Kent, London.
  33. Torabi, A., Hassanzadeh, A. & Fayazbakhsh, A. (2007). Effect of plant density on some morphophysiological properties of two bean cultivar. Iranian Journal of Agronomy, 74, 62-71. (in Farsi)
  34. Tuba-Bicer, B., Narin kalender, A. & Akar, D. A. (2004). The effect of irrigation on spring-sown chickpea. Journal of Agronomy, 3, 154-158.
  35. Vaghar, M. S., Nour-Mohammadi, G., Shams, K., Pazoki, A. & Kobraie, S. (2009). Evaluation of yield and yield component of three pea cultivar under dry land farming in different planting date in Kermanshah. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 5, 1-18. (in Farsi)
  36. Watt. J. & Singh, R. K. (1992). Response of late sown lentil to seed rate, row spacing and phosphorus levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 37, 522-593.