Effect of application methods of phosphate and zinc sulfate fertilizers on water use efficiency and qualitative characteristics of corn under water deficit stress

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Former M.Sc. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Ph. D. Candidate, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

چکیده

To study the effects of phosphate and zinc sulfate fertilizers application methods on water use efficiency and qualitative characteristics of corn underwater stress, an experiment was conducted in split plot factorial arrangement on randomized complete block design with three replications at research farm of the Bu Ali Sina University in 2014. Three levels of irrigation after 60, 90, and 120 mm evaporations from evaporation A pan were assigned in the main plots and two factors including phosphate fertilizer application methods (broadcasting and band placement) and zinc sulfate (non, foliar, and soil application) were assigned in sub-plots. Measured traits included protein percent in the grain, phosphorus and zinc content in the grain, and water use efficiency. Results showed that at severe water deficit stress, foliar application of zinc sulfate and band placement phosphate fertilizer compared to no zinc sulfate in the same application increased grain protein by 12%. The highest water use efficiency (1.50 kg grain per cubic meter of water) was obtained from treatment after 90 mm evaporation and band placement of phosphate and foliar application of zinc sulfate. In severe water stress conditions, band placement phosphate increased grain phosphorous content by 26%. Eventually, the highest and the lowest grain zinc concentration were 16.58 and 11.53 mg kg-1, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of application methods of phosphate and zinc sulfate fertilizers on water use efficiency and qualitative characteristics of corn under water deficit stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Aboutalebian 1
  • Noushin Fakhimi Paydar 2
  • Shahram Nazari 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Former M.Sc. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Ph. D. Candidate, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

To study the effects of phosphate and zinc sulfate fertilizers application methods on water use efficiency and qualitative characteristics of corn underwater stress, an experiment was conducted in split plot factorial arrangement on randomized complete block design with three replications at research farm of the Bu Ali Sina University in 2014. Three levels of irrigation after 60, 90, and 120 mm evaporations from evaporation A pan were assigned in the main plots and two factors including phosphate fertilizer application methods (broadcasting and band placement) and zinc sulfate (non, foliar, and soil application) were assigned in sub-plots. Measured traits included protein percent in the grain, phosphorus and zinc content in the grain, and water use efficiency. Results showed that at severe water deficit stress, foliar application of zinc sulfate and band placement phosphate fertilizer compared to no zinc sulfate in the same application increased grain protein by 12%. The highest water use efficiency (1.50 kg grain per cubic meter of water) was obtained from treatment after 90 mm evaporation and band placement of phosphate and foliar application of zinc sulfate. In severe water stress conditions, band placement phosphate increased grain phosphorous content by 26%. Eventually, the highest and the lowest grain zinc concentration were 16.58 and 11.53 mg kg-1, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Band placement
  • foliar
  • soil application
  • zinc concentration
  1. Aboutalebian, M. A. & Moqisaei, F. (2016). Effect of on farm seed priming and application methods of zinc sulfate fertilizer on some growth indices of two corn cultivars in Hamedan. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 5(18), 255-268.
  2. Akhtar, N., Abdul, M. S. M., Akhter, H. & Katrun, N. M. (2009). Effect of planting time and micronutrient as zinc chloride on the growth, yield and oil content of Mentha piperita. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 44(1), 125-130.
  3. Al-Kaisi, M. M. & Xinhua, Y. (2003). Effects of nitrogen rate, irrigation rate and plant population on corn yield and water use efficiency. Agronomy Journal, 95, 1475-1482.
  4. Allen, R. R. & Musik, J. T. (1993). Planting date, water management, and maturity length relations for irrigated grain sorghum. Transactions of the ASAE (American Society of Agricultural Engineers), 36 (4), 1123-1129.
  5. Andrade, F.H., Echarte, L., Rizalli, R., Della Maggiora, A. & Casanovas, M. (2002). Kernel number prediction in maize under nitrogen or water stress. Crop Science, 42, 1173-1179.
  6. Bagci, S. A., Ekiz, H., Yilmaz, A. & Cakmak, I.  (2007). Effect of zinc deficiency and drought on grain yield of field-grown wheat cultivars in central Anatolia. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 193, 189-206.
  7. Bukvic, G., Antunovic, M., Popovic, S. & Rastija, M. (2003). Effect of P and Zn fertilization on biomass yield and its uptake by maize lines (Zea mays L.). Journal of Plant, Soil and Environment, 49(11), 505-510.
  8. Cakmak, I., Kalayci, M., Ekiz, H., Braun, H. J. & Yilmaz, A. (1999). Zinc and human nutrition in Turkey: NATO. Science for Stability Project. Field Crops Research, 60, 175-188.
  9. Chapman, H. D. & Pratt, P. F. (1978). Methods of analysis for soils, plant and water. University of California, Department of Agricultural Science, Priced Publication, 4034 USA.
  10. FAO. (2012). FAOSTAT-Agriculture Database, Retrieved September 28, 2015, from: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
  11. Farley, O.R. & Coot, W.J. (1998). Temperature and soil water effects on maize growth, development, yield and forage quality. Crop Science, 36, 341-348.
  12. Ghasemian, V., Ghalavand, A., Sorooshzadeh, A. & Pirzad, A. (2010). The effect of iron, zinc and manganese on quality and quantity of soybean seed. Journal of Phytology, 2(11), 73-79.
  13. Heidarian, A. R., Kord, H., Mostafavi, K., Lak, A. P. & Amini Mahshhadi, F. (2011). Investigation Fe and Zn foliar application on yield and its components of soybean (Glycine max L.) at different growth stages. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 3(9), 189-197.
  14. Huang, Y. L., Chen, L. D., Fu, B.J., Huang, Z. L. & Gong, J. (2005). The wheat yields and water-use efficiency in the Loess Plateau: straw mulch and irrigation effects. Agricultural Water Management, 72, 209–222.
  15. Hussein, M. M., Abd El-Kader, A. A., Mona, A. & Soliman, M. (2009). Mineral status of plant shoots and grains of barley under foliar fertilization and water stress. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 5(2), 108-115.
  16. Khan, H. R., McDonald, G. K. & Rengel, Z. (2003). Zn fertilization improves water use efficiency, grain yield and seed Zn content in chickpea. Plant and Soil, 249, 389-400.
  17. Narimani, H., Rahimi, M. M., Ahmadikhah, A. & Vaezi, B. (2010). Study on the effects of foliar spray of micronutrient on yield and yield components of durum wheat. Archives of Applied Science Research, 2(6), 168-176.
  18. Ozturk, A. & Aydin, F. (2004). Effect of water stress at various growth stages on some quality characteristics of winter wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 93-99.
  19. Rahim, A., Ranjha, A., Rahamtullah, M. & Waraich, E. A. (2010). Effect of phosphorus application and irrigation scheduling on wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency. Soil and Environment,29, 15-22.
  20. Rahman, M. T., Jahiruddin, M., Humauan, M. R., Alam, M. J. & Khan, A. A. (2008). Effect of sulfur and zinc on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of Boro rice (cv. Bree Dhan 29). Journal of Soil Nature, 2(3), 10-15.
  21. Ranjbar, G. A. & Bahmaniar, M. A. (2007). Effect of soil and spray application of Zn fertilizer on yield and growth characteristic of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 6, 1000-1005.
  22. Sadeghipour, O. & Aghaei, P.  (2012). Response of common bean to exogenous application of salicylic acid under water stress conditions. Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(3), 1160-1168.
  23. Sangwan, P. S. & Raj, M. (2004). Effect of zinc nutrition on yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under dry land conditions. Indian Journal of Dry Land Agriculture and Development, 19(1), 1-3.
  24. Shah, S. K. H., Aslam, M., Khan, P., Memon, M. Y., Imtiaz, M. & Siddiqui, S. Nizamuddin. (2006). Effect of different methods and rates of phosphorus application in mungbean. Soil and Environment, 25, 55-58.
  25. Tariq, M., Rozina, G., Fazal, M., Fazal, J., Zahid, H., Nadia, N., Hamayoon, Kh. & Hayatullah, Kh. (2011). Effect of different phosphorus levels on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 27, 165-170.
  26. Thalooth, A. T., Tawfik, M. M. & Magda, M. H. (2006). Comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(1), 37-46.
  27. Verma, K. C. & Abidi, A. B. (2009). Effect of phosphorus and molybdenum on biochemical, yield and yield attributing parameters of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). African Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 1, 67-69.
  28. Whiting, D., Card, A. & Wilson, C. (2009). Plant nutrition. Colorado State University Extension.