اثر تنش خشکی بر تخصیص مواد فتوسنتزی ژنوتیپ‌های لوبیاچیتی (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان

2 استادیار، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان

چکیده

به‌منظور ارزیابی تأثیر تنش خشکی بر تخصیص مواد فتوسنتزی گیاه لوبیاچیتی (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت­های خردشده در قالب بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار در مزرعۀ پژوهشی دانشگاه زنجان اجرا شد. در این آزمایش، سطوح آبیاری در دو سطح (آبیاری مطلوب و تنش خشکی بعد از گلدهی) در کرت‌های اصلی و شش ژنوتیپ لوبیاچیتی (محلی خمین، COS16، صدری، KS21193، KS21191، KS21189) در کرت‌های فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج این بررسی نشان داد که تنش خشکی اثر معنی‌داری بر نسبت وزن ساقه و نسبت وزن غلاف داشت. ژنوتیپ KS21191 در شرایط تنش خشکی به‌دلیل تخصیص کمتر مواد فتوسنتزی به برگ‌ها و برخورداری از وزن خشک غلاف و زیست‌تودۀ بیشتر، از عملکرد دانۀ بیشتری برخوردار بود. در کل ژنوتیپ‌هایی که مواد فتوسنتزی کمتری به برگ‌ها و ساقه، و بیشترین مواد فتوسنتزی را به غلاف اختصاص دادند، در شرایط تنش برتری داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of drought stress on photo assimilate allocation of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Rezaei 1
  • farhad jabbari 2
1 Former Graduate Student, Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University
چکیده [English]

In order to estimate effects of drought stress on dry matter allocation of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), an experiment was carried out as split plot based on complete randomized block design with four replications at Zanjan university research farm. In this experiment,  two irrigation levels (optimum irrigation during growth season and post flowering drought stress) were set at main plots and  six pinto bean cultivars (Khomein, COS16, sadri, KS21193, KS21191, KS21189) were set at sub plots. Results showed that drought stress had significant effects on stem weight ratio and pod weight ratio. Also, KS21191 genotype had the highest grain yield under drought stress because of less allocation of photoassimilates to leaves and higher pod weight and higher biomass. Generally, cultivars that allocate less photoassimilates to leaves and stems and higher photoassimilates to pods had the priority under drought stress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biomass
  • Grain yield
  • pod dry weight
  • pod weight ratio
  • stem weight ratio

مراجع

  1. Bhatt, R. M. & Srinivasa Roa, N. K. (2005). Influence of pod load on response of okra to water stress. Indian J.Plant Physiol, 10, 54-59.
  2. Boogard, R., Veneklaas, E. & Lambers, H. (1996). The association of biomass allocation with growth and water use efficiency of two T.aestivum cultivars. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 23, 751-761.
  3. Chartzoulakis, K., Patakas, A., Kofidis, G., Bosabalidis, A. & Nastou, A. (2002). Water stress affects leaf anatomy, gas exchange, water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars. Sci. Hortic, 95, 39-50.
  4. Erice, G., Louahlia, S., Irigoyen, J. J., Sanchez-Diaz, M. & Avice, J. C. (2010). Biomass par-titioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. J. Plant Physiol, 167, 114-120.
  5. Frahm, M. A., Rosas, J. C., Mayek-Perez, N., Lopez-Salinas, E., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A. & Kelly, J. D. (2004). Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica, 136(2), 223-232.
  6. Foster, E. F., Pajarito, A. & AcostaGallegos, J. (1995). Moisture stress impact on N partitioning, N remobilization and N-use efficiency in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Agric Sci (Cambridge), 124, 27-37.
  7. Gorka, E., Louahlia, S., Irigoyen, J. J., Sánchez-Díaz, M., Alami, I. T. & Avice, J. C. (2011). Water use efficiency, transpiration and net CO2 exchange of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 72, 123-130.
  8. Habibi, G. R., Bihamta, M. R., Souhani, A. R. & Dorii, H. R. (2008) .A study of some morphological characteristics affecting grain yield and yield components in bean under reduced irrigation. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 39 (1), 51-62. (In Farsi).
  9. Hayat, S. & Ahmad, A. (2007). Salicylic acid. A plant hormone. Springer, 97-99.
  10. Hopkins, W. G. (1999). Introduction to Plant Physiology. John Wiely. New York.
  11. Jabbari, F., Ahmadi, A. & Pour Yousef, M. (2010). Evaluation of relative growth rate and allocation of assimilates in resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) to drought stress. Iranian Journal ofModern Agricultural Technologies, 4(2), 41-58. (In Farsi)
  12. Jolaei, M. (2005). The effect of mild water stress on some physiological characteristics and the level of enzyme activity of anti-oxidants of different cultivars of wheat. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. (In Farsi).
  13. Kazemi Arbat, H. (1999). Dryland farming. Tabriz University Publications. Tabriz, Iran, pp 507. (In Farsi)
  14. Keller, J. & Bliesner, R. D. (1990). Sprinkler and trickle irrigation. An avi book, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 652.
  15. Kisman, A. (2003). Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of soybean. Sci. Phil. Term paper. Borgor Agric. Univ. (Institut Ppertanian Borgor).
  16. Kouchacki, A. & Banayan Avval, M. (1994). Agricultural crops. Third Edition. Mashhad University Jihad Publications, Mashhad, Iran. (In Farsi)
  17. Lak, S., Naderi, N., Siadat, S. A., Aynehband, A. & Noormohammadi, G. h. (2007). Effects of water deficiency stress on yield and nitrogen efficiency of grain corn hybrid KSC 704 at different nitrogen rates and plant population. Iranian J. Agric. Sci. Natur, Resour, 14(2), 63-76. (In Farsi)
  18. Majnon Hosein, N. (2009). Agronomy and Pulses Production, 4th edition. Tehran University Jihad Publications, Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi)
  19. Munoz- Perea, C. G., Teran, H., Allen, R. G., Wright, J. L., Westermann, D. T. & Singh, S. P. (2006). Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sci, 46, 2111-2120.
  20. Nazari Nasi, H. (2010). Effect of drought stress on cell membrane stability, photosynthesis rate, relative water content and seed yield of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. M. Sc. dissertation, University of zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. (In Farsi)
  21. Nilsen, E. T. & Orcutt, D. M. (1996). The Physiology of plants under stress. John Wiley & sons, New York. pp. 322-361.
  22. Parida-Ramirez, J. S., Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., Acosta-Diaz, E., Mayek- Perez, N. & Kelly, J. D. (2005). Partitioning and partitioning rate to seed yield in drought stressed and non-stressed dry bean genotypes. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv, Crop, 48, 153-175.
  23. Parsa, M. & Bagheri, A. (2008). Legumes. Mashhad University Jihad Publications. Mashhad, Iran, pp 522. (In Farsi)
  24. Richards, R. A. (1987). Physiology and the breeding of winter-grown creales for dry areas. 133-145. In Srivestave J. P., E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo and S. Varma eds. Drought tolerance in winter cereals. John Wiley Press. New York.
  25. Romdhane, S. B., Trabelsib, M., Elarbi, M., Lajudie, P. & Mhamdia, R. (2009). The diversity of rhizobia nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under water deficiency as a source of more efficient inoculants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, 2568-2572.
  26. Rosales-Serna, R., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., Trejo-Lopez, C., Ortiz-Cereceres, J. & Kelly, J. D. (2002). Yield and phenological adjustment in four drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop, 45, 198-199.
  27. Rynolds, M. P., Mujeeb-kazi, A. & Sawkins, M. (2005). Prospects for utilizing plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought and salinity-prone environments. Ann. Biol, 146, 239-259.
  28. Saxena, C. M., Silim, S. N. & Singh, B. K. (1990). Effect of supplementary irrigation during reproductive growth on winter and spring chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. J. Agric. Sci, 114, 285-293.
  29. Shenkut, A. A. & Brick, M. A. (2003). Traits associated with dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity under diverse soil moisture environments. Euphytica, 133(3), 339-347.
  30. Sivakumar M. V. K. & Shaw, R. H. (1978) Methods of growth analysis in field grown soybean (Glycine max L. Merill). Ann Bot, 42, 213-222.
  31. Sivaramaiah, N., Malik, D. K. & Sindhu, S. S. (2007). Improvement in symbiotic efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) by co inoculation of Bacillus strains with Mesorhizobium sp. Cicer. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 47, 51-56.
  32. Turkan, I., Bor, M., Ozdemir, F. & Koca, H. (2005). Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaves of drought- tolerant P. acutifolius Gray and drought- sensitive P. vulgaris L. subjected to polyethylene glycol mediated water stress. Plant Sci, 168, 223-231.
  33. Zobayed, S. M. A., Afreen, F. & Kozai, T. (2007). Phytochemical and physiological changes in the leaves of St. Johns wort plants under a water stress condition. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59, 109-116.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 16 فروردین 1393
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 اسفند 1393
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 07 فروردین 1394
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 تیر 1394

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار