ارزیابی ﺗﺄثیر علف‌کش‌ها بر مدیریت علف‌های هرز و عملکرد دانۀ نژادگان‌های برنج در شرایط کشت مستقیم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده کشاورزی- دانشگاه گیلان

2 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان- رشت، ایران

3 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان

4 بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی- موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور- رشت

چکیده

به‌منظور ارزیابی ﺗﺄثیر علف‌کش‌ها بر مدیریت علف‌های‌هرز و عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌های مختلف برنج، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 96-95 در ﻣﺆسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور واقع در شهرستان رشت انجام گرفت. آزمایش به‌صورت کرت‌های خرد‌شده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. کرت‌های اصلی شامل پنج سطح مدیریت علف‌هرز به‌صورت 1- مصرف متوالی پندیمتالین، بن‌سولفورون‌متیل، سای‌هالوفوپ ‌بوتیل 2- مصرف متوالی پندیمتالین، بن‌سولفورون‌متیل، سای‌هالوفوپ‌بوتیل 3- مصرف متوالی پرتیلاکلر، بن‌سولفورون‌متیل، پروپانیل، 4- مصرف متوالی پرتیلاکلر، بن‌سولفورون‌متیل، پروپانیل به‌همراه 5- شاهد آلوده به علف‌هرز (بدون مصرف علف‌کش) تحت جامعه طبیعی علف‌های‌هرز و کرت‌های فرعی نیز شامل 10 ژنوتیپ برنج بودند. نتایج نشان داد که اثر ژنوتیپ، مدیریت علف‌هرز و اثر متقابل آن‌ها بر تمامی صفات مورد ارزیابی شامل زیست‌توده علف‌های‌هرز، ارتفاع بوته، اجزای عملکرد و عملکرد دانه برنج معنی‌دار بود. ژنوتیپ‌های برنج واکنش‌های متفاوتی را از نظر صفات مورد‌بررسی در هر سطج مدیریت علف‌هرز نشان دادند که علت این امر به توانایی رقابتی متفاوت ارقام نسبت داده می‌شود. تمامی تیمارهای علف‌کشی سبب کاهش معنی‌دار زیست‌توده علف‌های‌هرز و افزایش عملکرد دانه در تمامی ژنوتیپ‌ها در مقایسه با شاهد آلوده به علف‌هرز شدند؛ با این وجود تیمار مصرف متوالی پرتیلاکلر، بن‌سولفورون‌متیل، پروپانیل با دارا بودن کمترین زیست‌توده علف‌های‌هرز و بالاترین کارآیی کنترل آن‌ها و همچنین بالاترین میزان عملکرد دانه در تمامی ژنوتیپ‌ها ، بهترین ترکیب علف‌کشی جهت کنترل مطلوب علف‌های‌هرز بوده و به‌نظر می‌رسد که بتواند جایگزین مناسبی برای وجین دستی به‌منظور کاهش هزینه‌های کارگری و اقتصادی‌تر نمودن تولید برنج باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation the effect of herbicides on weed management and grain yield of rice genotypes in direct- seeded conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Rajabian 1
  • Jafar Asghari 2
  • Seyyed Mohammad Reza Ehteshami 3
  • Bijan yaghoubi 4
1 Faculty of Agriculture- University of Guilan
2 Department of Agronomy and Crop Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Iran.
3 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Collage of Agriculture, University of Guilan
4 Plant Protection Department, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Rasht
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluate the effect of herbicides on weed management and grain yield of rice genotypes, an experiment was conducted at Rice Research Institute of Iran in Rasht during 2016-17 cropping season. The experiment was laid out in a split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments included five levels of weed management as 1- sequential application of pendimethalin followed by bensulfuron-methyl followed by cyhalofop- butyl; 2- pretilachlor fb bensulfuron- methyl fb cyhalofop-butyl; 3- pendimathelin fb bensulfuron- methyl fb propanilﺗ 4- pretilachlor fb bensulfuron- methyl fb propanil) and 5- weedy check under natural weed flora as the main plots and ten rice genotypes as subplots. The results showed that the effects of genotype, weed management and their interaction was significant on all traits including weed biomass, plant height, yield components and grain yield of rice. Rice genotypes showed different responses in terms of evaluated traits at each level of weed management, which may be related to different competitive ability of genotypes. All herbicide treatments significantly reduced the weed biomass and increased grain yield of all genotypes compared with weedy checkﺗ however sequential application of pretilachlor followed by bensulfuron- methyl followed by propanil is the best herbicide combination because of the least weed biomss and highest weed control efficiency and also the highest grain yield in all genotypes. It seems that this combination of herbicides can be a good alternative for hand weeding in order to reduce labor costs and more economical production of rice.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bensulfuron- methyl
  • cyhalofop- butyl
  • pendimethalin
  • pretilachlor
  • propanil
  1. Aalaee Bazkiyaei, P., Asghari, J., Moradi, P. & Amiri, E. (2017). Rice yield variations as affected by direct seeding and herbicide application. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 10(4):809-822 (In Farsi)
  2. Allahgholipour, M., Moumeni, A., Nahvi, M., Yekta, M, & Zarbafi, S. (2012). Identification of parental combinations for improvement of rice grain quality, yield and yield components in rice. Cereal Research, 1(1): 1-10 (In Farsi).
  3. Allahgholipour, M., Skokoofeh, A. A., Yekta, M., Shafiei Sabet, H., Mohammadi, M. & Lotfi, A. (2015). Improvement of rice cultivars for yield and quality characters through farmer ʼs participatory breeding programs. Rice Research Institute of Iran. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Rasht, Iran. Pp. 41.
  4. Aminpanah, H (2011). Response of more and less competitive rice cultivars to different densities of barnyardgrass. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4(4):67-84 (In Farsi).
  5. Awan, I. U., Abbas, T. & Nadeem, M. A. (2001). Production efficiency of six rice cultivars against various herbicides applied for weed control in direct wet- seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) culture. Journal of Biological Sciences, 9, 823-830.
  6. Awan, T. H., Sta Cruz, P. C. & Chauhan, B. S. (2015). Agronomic indices, yield- contributing traits, and yield of dry- seeded rice under varying herbicides. Field Crops Research, 177, 15- 25.
  7. Balasubramanian, V. & Hill, J. E. (2002). Direct seeding of rice in Asia: emerging issues and strategic research needs for the 21st century. In: Pandey, S., Mortimer, M., Wade, L., Tuong, T. P., Lopez, K., Hardy, B. (Eds), Direct Seeding: Research Strategies and Opportunities. Inter. Rice. Res. Inst., Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 15- 42.
  8. Bhurer, K. P., Yadav, D. N., Ladha, J. K., Thapa, R. B. & Pandey, K. R. (2013). Efficacy of various herbicides to control weeds in dry direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture& Health Sciences, 2(4):205-212.
  9. Caton, B. P., Cope, E. A. & Mortimer, M. (2003). Growth traits of diverse rice cultivars under severe competition: Implication for screening for competitiveness. Field Crops Research, 83, 157- 172.

10. Chahan, B. S. (2012). Weed ecology and weed management sterategies for dry seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technology, 26, 1-13.

11. Chauhan, B. S., Awan, T. H., Abugho, S. B., Evengelista, G. & Yadav, S. (2015). Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management, and rice yield. Field Crops Research,172,72-84.

12. Crops Statistics. (2014-2015). growing season. Ministry of Agriculture, Department of planning and economy, center of information and communication technology. Pp.163 (In Farsi).

13. Dhima, K., Vasilakoglu, I., Lithourgidis, A., Mecolari, E., Keco, R., Agolli, X. & Eleftherohorinos, I. (2008). Phytotoxicity of 10 winter barley varieties and their competitive ability against common poppy and ivy-leaved speedwell. Experimental Agriculture, 44, 385-397.

14. Ebrahimpour Lish, A., Asghari, J., Moradi, P. & Samizade, H. (2017). Determining the Optimum Concentration of Pretilachlor and Sunrice plus Herbicides for Weed control in rice. Journal of Crop Production and Processing , 6 (22), 121-134 (In Farsi).

15. Elkoca, E., Kantar, F. & Zengin, H. (2004). Effects of chemical and agronomical weed control treatments on weed density, yield and yield parameters of lentil (Lens culinaris L. Cv. Eruzurum-89). Asian Journal of Plant Science, 3(2):187-192.

16. FAO, 2014. FAOSTAT. Statistical Databases. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http:/ www.fao.org

17. Farooq, M., Siddique, K. H. M., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D-J. & Wahid, A. (2011). Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil and Tillage Research, 111, 87- 98.

18. Fischer, A. J., Granados, E. & Trujillo, D. (1993). Propanil resistance in population of jungle rice (Echinochloa colona) in Combodian rice fields. Weed Science, 41, 201-206.

19. Fischer, A. J., Ramirez, H.V., Gibson, K. D. & Da Silveira, P. D. (2001). Competitiveness of semi dwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (B. decumbens) . Agronomy Journal, 93, 967- 973.

20. Hill, J. E., Bayaer, D. E., Bocchi, S. & Clampett, W. S. (1990). Direct seeded rice in thetemperate climates of Australia, Italy, and the United States. Selected papers from the International Rice Research Conference, Seoul, Korea.  27-31 August 1990. pp, 91- 102.

21. Ishaya, D. B., Dadari, S. A. & Shebayan, J. A. Y. (2007). Evaluation of herbicide for weed control in three varieties of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the Nigerian Savannah. Crop Protection, 26, 1490-1495.

22. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). (2009). International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association, Basserdorf, Switzerland.

23. Khaliq, A. & Matloob,A. (2011). Weed crop competition period in three fine rice cultivars under direct seeded rice culture. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science and Research, 17, 229-243.

24. Khaliq, A., Hussain, M., Matloob, A., Tanveer, A., Zamir, S. I., Afzal. I. & Aslam, F. (2014). Weed growth, herbicide efficacy indices, crop growth and yield of wheat are modified by herbicide and cultivar interaction. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science and Research, 20(1):91-109.

25. Kim, J. K., Lee, M. H. & Kim, Y. S. (2000). Labor saving cultivation technologies of rice in Korea direct seeding and machine transplanting- national crop experimental station, Rural development  Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea.

26. Kumar, P., Singh, Y. & Singh, U. P. (2012). Effect of cultivars and herbicides on weed growth and yield of boro rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Bio- resource and Stress Management, 3, 59- 62.

27. Kumar, V. & Ladha, J. K. (2011). Direct seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Advances in Agronomy, 111, 297- 413.

28. Lemerle, D., Verbleek, B., Cousens, R. D. & Coombes, N. E. (1996). The potential for selecting wheat cultivars strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Research, 36, 505- 513.

29. Mahajan, G. & B. S. Chauhan. (2015). Weed control in dry direct-seeded rice using tank mixtures of herbicides in South Asia. Crop Protection, 72, 90- 96.

30. Mahajan, G., Poonia, V. & Chauhan, B. S. (2014). Integrated weed managemnt using planting pattern, cultivar, and herbicide in dry- seeded rice in northwest India. Weed Science, 62, 350- 359.

31. Muan, M. A. & Barrett, S. C. H. (1986). The biology of Canadian weeds. 77. Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 66:739-759.

32. Nasiri, S., Asghari, J., Samizadeh, H., Moradi, P. & Shirzad, F. (2014). Evaluation of oxadiargyl and thiobencarb herbicides efficacy on rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and yield components. Cereal Research, 3(4): 307-319 (In Farsi).

33. Pacanoski, Z. & Glatkova, G. (2009). The use of herbicides for weed control in direct wet-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in rice production regions in the Republic of Macedonia. Plant Protection Science, 45, 113-118.

34. Parvez, Md.S., Abdus Salam, Md., Kato-Noguchi, H. & Begum, M. (2013). Effect of cultivar and weeding regime on the performance of translant aman rice. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 6(11): 654-666.

35. Rahman,M., Juraimi, A. S., Suria J., Man, A. B. & Anwar, P. (2012). Response of weed flora to different herbicides in aerobic rice system. Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 12-23.

36. Sharma, P. K., Ladha, J. K. & Bhushan, L. (2003). Soil physical effects of puddling in the rice- wheat cropping system.In: Ladha , J. K., et al. (Eds), Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice- wheat systems: Issues and Impacts, ASA Spec Publ. 65. ASA, CSSA, and SSA. Madison, WI, pp.97-114.

37. Singh, V. P., Singh, S. P., Dhyani, V. C., Tripathy, N., Banga, A. & Yadav, V. R. (2013). Effect of establishment methods on shifting of weed flora in rice- wheat cropping systems. In: Proc. 24th Asian- Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, October 22-25, 2013, Bandung, Indonesia, p, 494.

38. Singh, V., Jat, M. L., Ganie, Z. A., Chauhan, B. S. & Gupta, R. K. (2016). Herbicide options for effective weed management in dry direct- seeded rice under scented rice- wheat rotation of Western Indo- Gangetic Plains. Crop Protection, 81, 168-176.

39. Yaghoobi, B. & Tahghighi, H. (2015). Herbicide Efficacy and rice cultivar type effect on Scirpus maritimus L. control in paddy rice. In: Proceedings of 6th Iranian Weed Science Congress, 1-3 sep, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran, pp. 1158- 1161 (In Farsi).

40. Yamasue, Y. (2001). Strategy of Echinochloa oryzicola for survival in flooded rice. Weed Biological Management, 1:28-36.