نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
2 عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پارسا آباد، صندوق پستی 53356-56918، پ ارسا آباد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Selecting an appropriate variety considering the conditions of each region is an agricultural solution to achieve a desirable performance of plants in drought stress conditions. For this purpose, an experiment was conducted in a split plot arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Moghan plain at 2015 and 2016 years. Main-plot was Normal irrigation, cutting irrigation during vegetative growth stage, cutting irrigation during flowering stage and cutting irrigation during growth of fruit. Cultivars included Super Bita, 08 and Matin as a sub-plot. The results of mean comparisons of data demonstrated that cutting irrigation decreased growth and yield of all cultivars as much as 11 items than normal irrigation treatment. Also, the highest yield (69.46 ton per hectare) and yield components (Number fruit per each plant: 61.66, Average fruit weight (gr):220, Fruit diameter: 5.6 cm and Biomass: 73.68 ton per hectare) observed in 08 economic cultivar under normal irrigation and the lowest values for these traits were obtained in Matin cultivar at cutting irrigation in flowering and fruit growth sages. Also, about morphological traits (Plant height, Stem diameter and the number of lateral branches) the lowest values observed in Matin and Super Bita under cutting irrigation during the growth stages. Therefore, 08 was the best variety (According to the results of traits related to yield, yield components and morphological traits in both of normal irrigation and cutting irrigation conditions) and Matin was the most sensitive variety to cutting the irrigation in Moghan Plain.
کلیدواژهها [English]
10. Karimi, B., Vafaee, Yavar., Abdi, Ch. & Golzari, A. (2015). Effect of different deficit irrigation regimes using surface and subsurface system on Shaghayegh and Shahrzad tomato cultivars performance under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 5(16), 133-143. (In Farsi).
11. Lahoz, I., Pérez-de-Castro, A., Valcárcel, M., Macua, J.I., Beltránd, J., Rosellóc, S. & Cebolla-Cornejo, J. (2016). Effect of water deficit on the agronomical performance and quality of processing tomato. Journal of Science Horticulture, 200 (11), 55–65.
12. Malash, N.M., Flowers, T.J., & Ragab, R. (2008). Effect of irrigation methods, management and salinity of irrigation water on tomato yield, soil moisture and salinity distribution. Journal of IrrigationScience, 26(8), 313–323.
13. Miguel, A. & Francisco, M. (2007). Response of tomato plants to deficit irrigation under surface or subsurface drip irrigation. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 9(2), 97-100.
14. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, 2016. From (www.pr.maj.ir).
15. Mishell, J. P., Shennan, C., Grarran, S. R. & May, D. M. (1991). Tomato fruit yields and quality under deficit and salinity. Journal of the Agriculture, 18(7), 196-215.
16. Molavy, H., Mohammady, M. & Leiagat, A. (2011). The effect of complete irrigation on yield, yield component and water use efficiency on tomato. (Super Strain B). Journal of Soil and Water, 21(3), 115-126.(In Farsi).
17. Murshed, R., Lopez-Lauri, F. & Sallanon, H. (2013). Effect of water stress on antioxidant systems and oxidative parameters in fruits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L, cv. Micro-tom). Journal of Physiology and Biology Plants, 19 (5), 363–378.
18. Nurjoo, A., Zemorrody, SH. & Emamy, A. (2001). Effect of different level of irrigation in tomato culture. National Congress of Strategies to water crisis, 14-17 Oct.Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. Pp.800-8014. (In Farsi).
19. Nuruddin, M. M., Madramootoo, C. h. & Dodds, G. T. (2014). Effects of Water Stress at Different Growth Stages on Greenhouse Tomato Yield and Quality. Horticultural Science, 38(7), 1389- 1393.
20. Rui, M. A., Machado, A. E., Maria, D. R. & Oliveira, G. (2005). Tomato root distribution, yield and fruit quality under different subsurface drip irrigation regimes and depths. Journal of Irrigation Science, 24(10), 15–24.
21. SAS . (2008). Statistical analysis system institute. Cary, NC, USA.
22. Sato, S., Kamiyama, M., Iwata, T., Makita, N., Furukawa, H. & Ikeda, H. (2006). Moderate increase of mean daily temperature adversely affects fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) by disrupting specific physiological processes in male reproductive development. Annals of Botany, 97(8), 731–738.
23. Tafteh, A., Ebrahimy, N.A., Babazadeh, H & Kaveh. F. (2013). Evaluation of tomato production functions to estimate the performance of different irrigation treatments on the plain of Qazvin. 27(3): 315-328.
24. Topcu, S., Kirda, C., Dasgan, Y., Kaman, H., Cetin, M., Yazici, A. & Bacon, M.A. (2006). Yield response an N-fertilizer recovery of tomato grown under deficit irrigation. European Journal of Agronomy, 26: 64-70.
25. Vatankhah, A. (2009). Feasibility regions cultivation of citrus in Prsabad Moghan. M.Sc., Thesis. Azad University, Ahar branch, 95 p. (In Farsi).
26. Zafarani-Moattar, P., Raey, Y., Ghassemi-Golezani, K. & Mohammadi, S.A. (2010). Effect of Limited Irrigation on Growth and Yield of Bean Cultivars. . Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science. 21(4), 85-94.(In Farsi).
27. Zotarelli, L., Scholberg, J. M., Dukes, M. D., Mun˜ oz-Carpena, R. & Icerman, J. (2009). Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agricultural WaterManagement, 96 (20), 23- 34
)
