تأثیر کاربرد نیتروژن و الگوی کاشت جو و باقلا بر برخی صفات کمی و کیفی علوفه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه تولیدات گیاهی، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

2 مدیر جهاد کشاورزی گنبد کاووس

چکیده

به‎منظور بررسی تأثیر الگوی کاشت و نیتروژن مصرفی بر کمیت و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط جو و باقلا، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 92-1391 در مزرعۀ دانشکدۀ کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه گنبدکاووس به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. عامل الگوی کاشت در پنج سطح شامل کشت خالص جو، کشت مخلوط 25، 50 و 75 درصد باقلا به‌جای جو و کشت خالص باقلا بود. عامل کود نیتروژن در چهار سطح شامل 0، 25، 50 و 75 کیلوگرم نیتروژن خالص در هکتار بود. نتایج نشان داد که تأثیر الگوی کاشت بر عملکرد علوفه، ارتفاع بوته، درصد مادۀ خشک قابل‌هضم، پروتئین خام و فیبر غیرقابل‌حل در شوینده‌های اسیدی معنی‌دار شد. کود نیتروژن بر عملکرد علوفه، ارتفاع بوته، درصد پروتئین و درصد مادۀ خشک قابل‌هضم تأثیر افزایشی داشت. کشت خالص جو با 38/13 تن بیشترین و کشت خالص باقلا با 4/7 تن کمترین عملکرد علوفه را در هکتار تولید کردند. با افزایش نسبت باقلا در تیمارهای کشت مخلوط، عملکرد کل نسبت به کشت خالص جو کاهش یافت. بیشترین و کمترین پروتئین خام با 37/25 و 81/8 درصد و مادۀ خشک قابل‌هضم با 96/69 و 96/58 درصد به ترتیب از کشت خالص باقلا و جو به دست آمد. اگرچه عملکرد علوفه در کشت خالص جو زیاد بود، اما کیفیت پایینی داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of nitrogen application and planting pattern of faba bean (Vicia faba) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on some quantity and quality traits of forage

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Nakhzari Moghaddam 1
  • Gholam Ali Noora 2
  • Ali Rahemi Karizaki 1
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Crop Production, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran
2 Jihad Management of Gonbad Kavous, Iran
چکیده [English]

In order to study the effect of planting pattern and nitrogen application on barley and faba bean yield and quality of forage in intercropping, an experiment was conducted on farm of agricultural and natural resources faculty of Gonbad Kavous University as factorial based on RCBD with three replications in 2012-2013. Planting pattern consisted of five levels, i.e. sole barley, intercropping of barley with faba bean at 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 rations and sole faba bean and nitrogen fertilizer factor was comprised of four levels of 0, 25, 50 and 75 Kg N ha-1. The results showed that effect of planting pattern on forage yield, height, percentage of dry matter digestibility, crude protein and acid detergent fiber at 1% probability level were significant. Nitrogen fertilizer had additive effect on forage yield, height, percentage of dry matter digestibility and crude protein. Sole barley produced the highest yield with13.38 ton ha-1 and sole faba bean produced the lowest forage yield with 7.4 ton ha-1. With increasing of faba bean in intercropping treatments, total yield decreased compared to sole barley. The highest and lowest crude protein percentage with 25.37 and 8.81 and dry matter digestibility with 69.96 and 58.96 percent was obtained from sole faba bean and sole barley, respectively. Although forage yield in sole crop of barley was high but its quality was low.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ash
  • crude protein
  • DMD
  • intercropping

مراجع

  1. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. & Sinebo, W. (2006). Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ettiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25, 202-207.
  2. Assefa, G. & Ledin, I. (2001). Effect of variety, soil type and fertilizer on the establishment growth forage yield quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Animal Feed Science Technology, 92, 25-111.
  3. Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K. & Ghose, S.S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(4), 325-332.
  4. Colman, S.E. & Moore, J.E. (2003). Feed quality and animal performance. Field Crops Research, 84, 17-29.
  5. Connolly, J., Goma, H.C. & Rahim, K. (2001). The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agricultur, Ecosystems and Environment, 87(2), 191-207.
  6. Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Siasar, B. & Ramroudi, M. (2010). Effect of planting ratio and harvest time on forage quality of maize in maize-cowpea intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41(3), 633-642. (in Farsi)
  7. Esmaeili, A., Hossein, M. B., Mohammadi, M. & Hosseinikhah, F. S. (2012). Evaluation of grain yield, dry matter production and some of the forage and silage quality properties in annual medic (Medicago scutellata) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropping. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 28(3), 277-296. (in Farsi)
  8. Ghanbarzadeh, S., Chaichi, M. & Hossein, M. (2009). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application and sowing density on forage quality and weed population of corn (Zea mays L.) in an agroforestry system. Journal of Agronomy Science, 2(3), 25-38. (in Farsi)
  9. Giacomini, S.J., Vandruseolo, E.R.O., Cubilla, M., Nicoloso, R.S. & Fries, M.R. (2003). Dry matter, C/N ratio and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation in mixed soil cover crops in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do solo, 27(2), 325-334.
  10. Jafari Bilehsovar, R.,  Seyed Sharifi, R. & Imani,  A.A. (2012). Effects of nitrogen and harvesting date on fertilizer use efficiency and qualitative and quantitative yield of Sorghum bicolor. Journal of Crops Improvement, 14(2), 17-30. (in Farsi)
  11. Jafari, A., Conolly, V., Frolich, A. & Walsh, E.K. (2003). A note on estimation of quality in perennial ryegrass by near infrared spectroscopy. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 42, 293-299.
  12. Katiar, A.K., Chaudhary, H.P. & Uttam, S.K. (2003). Effect of mustard intercropping in barley under various fertility levels with and without interculture under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 31, 35-40.
  13. Li, W., Li, L., Sun, J., Guo, T., Zhung, F., Bao, X., Peng, A. & Tang, C. (2005). Effects of intercropping and nitrogen application on nitrate present in profile of an orthic Anthrosol in Northwest China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 483-491.
  14. Lithourgidis, A.S., Vaslakoglou, I.B., Dhima, K.V., Dordas, C.A. & Yiakoulaki, M.D. (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 99, 106-113.
  15. Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., Damalas, C.A. & Vlachostergios, D.N. (2011). Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(4), 396-410.
  16. Mazaheri, D. (1998). Intercropping. Tehran University Press. 262 pp. (in Farsi)
  17. Nakhzari Moghaddam, A. (2013). The yield and forage quality of intercropping barley and mustard in different planting dates. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 5(4), 173-189. (in Farsi)
  18. Payne, W.A. (2000). Optimizing crop water use in sparse stands of pearl millet. Journal of Agronomy, 92, 808-814.
  19. Pholsen, S., Higgs, D.E.B. & Suksri, A. (2001). Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on growth, chemical component, and seed yield of a forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.Moench) grown on oxic paleudults soil, Northeast Thailand. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(1), 27-31.
  20. Yolcu, H., Daci, M. & Tan, M. (2009). Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole crops and intercrop in spring frost conditions for animal feeding. I. Yield and quality. Journal of Animal and veterinary Advances, 8(7), 1337-1342.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 فروردین 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 آبان 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 آذر 1394
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 شهریور 1395

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار