ارزیابی صفات زراعی رازیانه (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) و شنبلیله (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) در کشت مخلوط

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان

2 استادیار، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد رازیانه و شنبلیله در الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط و تک‌کشتی، آزمایشی با استفاده از روش‌های جایگزینی و افزایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعۀ تحقیقاتی دانشکدۀ کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان در سال زراعی 1391 به اجرا در آمد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل کشت مخلوط افزایشی در سه سطح (100 درصد رازیانه+ 33، 66 و 100 درصد شنبلیله)، کشت مخلوط جایگزینی در شش سطح (1:1، 1:2، 2:1، 2:2، 1:3، 3:1)، کشت خالص رازیانه و کشت خالص شنبلیله بودند. نتایج نشان داد که تمامی صفات بررسی‌شده به‌غیر از وزن هزاردانه و شاخص برداشت رازیانه به‌طور معنی‌داری در سطح احتمال 5 درصد تحت تأثیر الگوهای مختلف کاشت قرار گرفتند. عملکرد شنبلیله و رازیانه با افزایش نسبت هر یک در کشت مخلوط افزایش یافت، به‌طوری که در شنبلیله بیشترین عملکرد دانه از کشت خالص و کمترین آن از سری جایگزینی 3:1 حاصل شد. همچنین در رازیانه، سری افزایشی 100 درصد رازیانه + 33 درصد شنبلیله و سری جایگزینی 1:3 به‌ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین عملکرد دانه را داشتند. نسبت برابری زمین در همۀ آرایش‌های کاشت بیشتر از یک بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of agronomical traits fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) – fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in intercropping

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sakineh Sadri 1
  • Majid Pouryousef 2
  • Ali Soleimani 2
  • Taher Barzegar 2
  • Khalil Jamshidi 2
1 Former Graduate Student, Facutly of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan
2 Assistant Professor, Facutly of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan
چکیده [English]

In order to study yield and yield components of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) – fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in different patterns of intercropping and sole cropping, an experiment with use replacement and additive intercropping based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted at the Research Station of Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University, Iran, during growing season 2012. Treatments included additive intercropping in three levels (%100 fennel + 33, 66 and %100 fenugreek), replacement intercropping in six levels (1:1, 1:2, 2:1, 2:2, 1:3, 3:1), Sole fennel and Sole fenugreek. Results showed that most traits significantly (p≤0/05) were affected by different sowing pattern with the exception 1000-seed weight and harvest index in fennel. Fenugreek and fennel yield increased with higher each of ratio in intercropping. The highest grain yield of Fenugreek was obtained in pure stand of Fenugreek and the lowest it was obtained in the 3:1 replacement series. Also in fennel %100 fennel + %33 fenugreek additive series and 1:3 replacement series have the highest and the lowest seed yield respectively. Land equivalent ratio (LER) was more than 1.00 in all sowing patterns.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • sowing pattern
  • replacement series
  • yield
  • LER

مراجع

  1. Abdel-Kader, M., El-Shamy, H.A., Meawad, A.A. & Bishr, G.A. (2012). Yield components and active ingredients of roselle and guar as influenced by intercropping system and nitrogen fertilization rate. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 157-166.
  2. Alabi, R.A. & Esobhawan, A.O. (2006). Relative economic Value of maize-okra intercrops in rainforestzone, Nigeria. Central European Agriculture, 3, 433-438.
  3. Awasthi, U.D., Tripathi, A.K., Dubey, S.D. & Kumar, S. (2011). Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on growth, productivity, competition and economics in chickpea + fennel intercropping system under scarce moisture condition. Journal of Food Legumes, 24(3), 211-214.
  4. Azam-Ali, S. N., Matthews, R. B., Williams, J. H. & Peacock, M. (1990). Light use, water uptake and performance of individual components of a sorghum-groundnut intercrop. Experimental Agriculture, 26, 413-417.
  5. Bagheri, M., Zaefarian, F., Akbarpour, V. & Asadi, G. A. (2012). Assessment of growth indices of soybean, vegetative sweet basil and borage in intercropping different ratios. Journal of Plant Production, 19 (3), 1-25. (In Farsi).
  6. Callavana, K. M. & Weil, R. R. (1988). Peanut-corn intercrop performance as affected by within-row corn spacing at a constant row spacing. Agronomy Journal, 80, 635-642.
  7. Carvalho, L.M., Oliveira, I.R., Almeida, N.A. & Andrade, K.R. (2010). The intercropping of fennel with beans and cowpeas in the agreste region of Brazil. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 925, 199-204.
  8. Damjanivic, B., Lepojevic, V. & Tolic, A. (2005). Extraction of fennel (Foeniculumvulgare Mill.) seeds with supercritical CO2: Comparison with hyrodistilation. Food Chemistry, 92, 143-149.
  9. Esmaeili, A., Hosseini, M.B., Mohammadi, M. & Hosseinikhah, F.S. (2011). Evaluation of grain yield, dry matter production and some of the forage and silage quality properties in annual medic (Medicago scutellata) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropping. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 2-28 (3), 277-296. (In Farsi).
  10. Griffe, P., Metha, S. & Shankar, D. (2003). Organic production of medicinal, aromatic and dye-yielding plants (MADPs): Forward, Preface and Introduction, FAO.
  11. Jahani, M., Koocheki, A. & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2007). Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 6 (1), 67-78. (In Farsi).
  12. Koochecki, A., Shabahang J., Khorramdel, S. & Azimi, R. (2010). The effect of irrigation intervals andintecropped marjoram (Origanum vulgare L.) with saffron (Crocus sativus L.) on possible cooling effect of cormsfor climate change adaptation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. (in Press). (In Farsi).
  13. Kumar, A., Singh, R. & Chhillar, R.K. (2006). Nitrogen requirement of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) based cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 76(10), 599-602.
  14. Mazaheri, D. (1993). Intercropping. Tehran University Publications, 262 p. (In Farsi).
  15. McLaughlin, A. & Mineau, P. (1995). The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 55, 201-212.
  16. Mead, R. & Willy, R.W. (1980). The concept of a land Equivalent Ratio and advantages in yield from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 217-228.
  17. Mirhashemi, S.M., Koocheki, A., Parsa, M. & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2009) (a). Evaluation benefit of Ajowan and Fenugreek intercropping indifferent levels of manure and planting pattern. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research,7(1), 259-269. (In Farsi).
  18. Mirhashemi, S.M., Koocheki, A., Parsa, M. & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2009) (b). Evaluation of growth indices of Ajowan and Fenugreek inpure culture and intercropping based on organic agriculture. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research,7(2), 685-694. (In Farsi).
  19. Morris, R. A., Villegas, A. N., Polthanee, A. & Centeno, H. S. (1990). Water use by monocropped and intercropped cowpea and sorghum after rice. Agronomy Journal, 82, 664-668.
  20. Mukhala, E., Juger, J.M. & Vanrensburg, L.D. (1999). Dietary nutrient deficiency in small-scale farmingcommunities in South Africa benefits of intercropping maize and beans. Nutrition Research Journal, 19(4), 629-641.
  21. Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghadam, P. & Beheshti, A. (2003). Agroecology (translation). Ferdosi University Publications, 459 p. (In Farsi).
  22. Olasantan, F.O., Ezumah, H. C. & Lucas, E. O. (1996). Effects of intercropping with maize on the microenvironment, growth and yield of cassava. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 57, 149-158.
  23. Omidbaigi, R. (2008). Production and processing of medicinal plants. Astan Quds Razavi Publications, Mashhad, 438 p. (In Farsi).
  24. Pandiata, A.K., Saha, M.H. & Bali, A.S. (2000). Effect of row ratio in cereal-legume intercropping systems on productivity and competition function under Kashmir condition. Indian Journal Agronomy, 45, 48-53.
  25. Putnam, D.H. & Allen, D.L. (1992). Mechanism for over yielding in sunflower-mustard intercrop. Agronomy Journal, 84,188-195.
  26. Rahimian, H., Salahi moghadam, M. & Glooi, M. (1991). Potato intercropping with maize and Sunflower.Agricultural Sciences and Technology Journal, (6), 45-58. (In Farsi).
  27. Rajeswara Rao, B.R. (2002). Biomass yield, essential oil yield and essential oil composition of Rose-scented geranium (Pelargonium species) as influenced by row spacing and intercropping with cornmint (Menthaarrensis L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 133-144.
  28. Rezvani Moghadam, P. & Moradi, R. (2011). Evaluation of planting dates, intercropping and biological fertilizers on the yield and quality of essential oil of cumin and fenugreek.Iranian Journal of Field Crop Scienc, 43 (2), 217-230. (In Farsi).
  29. Rezvani Moghadam, P., Raoofi, M. R., Rashed Mohassel, M. H. & Moradi, R. (2009). Evaluation of sowing patterns and weed control on mung bean (Vigna radiate L.Wilczek)-black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) intercropping system. Journal of Agroecology, 1(1), 65-79. (In Farsi).
  30. Siddiqhi Dehkordi, F., Hemmat zadeh, A. & Nazar Poor, M. (2011). Evaluating the benefit of Fennel and Ajowan intercropping in different levels of planting dates and plant distance. Seven Iranian Horticultural Sciences Congress. 5-8 September University of Esfahan, pp 2678. (In Farsi).
  31. Singh, A. & Mahey, R.K. (1994). A review on agrotechnology of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Madras Agriculture Journal, 81, 655-659.
  32. Tiwari, R.S., Agarwal, A. & Sengar, S.C. (2002). Effect of intercropping on yield and economics of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Crop Research, 23(2), 369-374.
  33. Tripathi, S. M. & Dwivedi, A. K. (2009). Remove from marked records economics of intercropping fennel with cauliflower. Annals of Horticulture, 2(1), 103-105.
  34. Willey, R.W. (1990). Resource use in intercropping systems. Agriculture Water Management, 17, 215-231.
  35. Yadav, U.C., Moorthy, K. & Baquer, N. Z. (2004). Effects of sodium-orthovanadate and Trigonella foenum-graecum seed son hepatic and renal lipogenic enzymes and lipid profile during alloxan diabetes. Journal Bio Sciences, 29, 81-91.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 تیر 1393
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 24 مهر 1393
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 24 مهر 1393
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 دی 1393

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار