Post-dispersal seed predation of four weed species in maize fields

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Post Graduate Studen in Weed Sicence, Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj

2 Professor, Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj

Abstract

To evaluate post-dispersal seed predation of weeds in maize fields, factorial experiments with four replications were conducted in 2007 in Mashhad and Chenaran, NE of Iran using four common weed species in maize field. Treatments were weed species, sampling periods and cages. Removal of Amaranthus retroflexus, Chenopodium album, Sorghum halepense and Datura stramonium were measured during seven sequential weeks in two maize fields from August until October 2007 Wire mesh cages were used to determine the predation by avian predators. Invertebrate seed predator activity-density was monitored using pitfall traps. Seed removal was significantly different between fields and among species. Post-dispersal seed predation was higher in Chenaran maize field (55درصد) than Mashhad field (47درصد) that could be resulted from difference in irrigation method and the number of invertebrate predators. Except some fluctuations during the predation period, seed removal decreased toward the end of experiments in both places. Cage exclusion had no significant effect on predation in both places, showing no significant removal of seeds by birds. Invertebrates were the most important predators in both fields and ants were the main invertebrateseed predators but other seed eater invertebrates like crickets and different seed eater carabid beetles were caught in to pitfalls too

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18, 265-267.
  2. Brust, G. E. & House, G. J. (1988). Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low -input soybean agroecosystems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 3, 19-35.
  3. Brust. G. E. (1994). Seed-predators reduce broadleaf weed growth and competitive ability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 48, 27-34.
  4. Cardina, J., Norquay, H., Stinner, B.R. & McCartney, D. A. D. (1996). Post-dispersal predation of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Science, 44, 534-539.
  5. Considine, M. D. (1982). Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia 6th edn. Van Nostrand’s Reinhold Company New York.
  1. Firbank, L. G. & Watkinson, A. R. (1986). Modeling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effects upon crop yield. Journal of Applied Ecology, 23, 147-159.
  1. Gallandt, E. R., Molloy, T., Lynch, R. P. & Drummond, F. A. (2005). Effect of cover-cropping systems on invertebrate seed predation. Weed Science, 53, 69-76.
  2. Ghersa, C. M. & Martínez-Ghersa, M. A. (2000). Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems: Implications for weed management. Field Crops Research, 67, 141-148.
  3. Hartzler, B., Liebman, M. & Westerman, P. (2006). Weed seed predation in agricultural fields. Accessed November 23, 2009, from: www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/2006/seedpredation.pdf.
  4. Heggenstaller, A. H., Menalled, F. D., Liebman, M. & Westerman, P. (2006). Seasonal patterns in post-dispersal seed predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi inthree cropping systems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 999-1010.
  5. Holmes, R. J. & Froud-Williams, R. J. (2005). Post-dispersal weed seed predation by avian and non-avian predators.  Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 23-27.
  6. Hulme, P. E. (1998). Post-dispersal seed predation and seed bank persistence. Seed Science Research, 8, 513-519.
  7. Jacob, S. H., Minkey, D. M., Gallagher, R. S. & Borger, C. P. (2006). Variation in postdispersal weed seed predation in a crop field. Weed Science, 54, 148-155.
  8. Marino, P. C., Westerman, P. R., Pinkert, C., & van der Werf, W. (2005). Influence of seed density and aggregation on post-dispersal weed seed predation in cereal fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 106, 17-25.
  9. Mauchline, A. L., Swanton, S. J., Brown, V. K. & Froud-Williams, R. J. (2005). Post-dispersal seed predation of non-target weeds in arable crops. Weed Research, 45, 157-164.
  10. Menalled, F. D., Marino, P. C., Renner, K. A. & Landis, D. A. (2000). Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 77, 193-202.
  11. Menalled, F. D., Smith, R. G., Dauer, J. T. & Fox, T. B. (2007). Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 118: 49–54.
  12. Mesgaran, M. B., Mashhadi, H. R., Zand, E. & Alizadeh, H. M. (2007). Comparison of three methodologies for different seed extraction in studies of soil weed seed banks. Weed Research, 47, 472-478.
  13. Mittelbach, G. G. & Gross, K. L. (1984). Experimental studies of seed predation in old-fields. Oecologia, 65, 7-13.
  14. Myster, R. W., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1993). Effects of litter, distance, density, density and vegetation patch type on post-dispersal tree seed predation in old fields. Oikos, 66, 381–388.
  15. Norris, R. (2007). Weed fecundity: Current status and future needs. Crop Protection, 26, 182–188
  16. Povey, F. D., Smith, H. & Watt, T. A. (1993). Predation of annual grass weed seeds in arable field margins. Annals of Applied Biology, 122, 323-328.
  17. Pullaro, T. C., Marino, P. C., Jackson, D. M., Harrison H. F. & Keinath, A. P. (2006). Effects of killed cover crop mulch on weeds, weed seeds, and herbivores. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115, 97-104
  18. Puricelli, E., Faccini, D., Orioli, G. & Sabbatini, M. R. (2005). Seed survival and predation of Anoda cristata in soyabeen crops. Weed Research, 45, 477-482.
  19. Rashed Mohasel, M. H., Najafi, H. & Akbarzadeh, M. (2001). Weed biology and control. Ferdowsi University press. Pp: 231-236. (in Farsi)
  20. Westerman, P. R., Hofman, A., Vet, L. E. M. & van der Werf, W. (2003a). Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 417-425.
  21. Westerman, P. R., Hofman, A., Vet, L. E. M. & van der Werf, W. (2003b). Annual losses of weed seeds due to predation in organic cereal fields. Journal of Applied Ecology,40, 824-836.
  22. Westerman, P., Liebman, M., Menalled, F. D., A, Heggenstaller, H., Hartzler, R. G. & Dixon, P. M. (2005). Are many little hammers effective?-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics in two- and four-year crop rotation systems. Weed Science, 53, 382-392.
  23. Wilson, B.J., Wright, K. J. & Butler, R. C. (1993). The effect of different frequencies of harrowing in the autumn or spring on winter wheat, and the control of Stellaria media (L.) vill., Galium aparine L. and Brassica napus L. Weed Research, 33, 501-506.
  24. WWW.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datura_stramonium#Toxicity. Accessed January 15, 2015.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 October 2014
  • Revise Date: 16 September 2015
  • Accept Date: 13 July 2015
  • Publish Date: 22 June 2015

Share

How to cite

Statistics